Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Arizona · Public charity

Quality Care Home Facilities

Engaged in the activities to provide elderly personal homes supporting the elderly.

$792k
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
2
Organizations funded FY2020
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Quality Care Home Facilities’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’20
0
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2021
$792,090
Largest grant, FY2021
$792,090
States reached, FY2021
1
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Philanthropy$802kReligion$20k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Christs Church of the Valley Inc$10,0001n/a
Arizona Fca$10,0001n/a

Compare Quality Care Home Facilities with peer funders

About Quality Care Home Facilities

How much does Quality Care Home Facilities give?
Quality Care Home Facilities reported 1 grants totaling $792,090 in its FY2021 IRS filing.
What does Quality Care Home Facilities fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2020, its largest causes are Philanthropy (98%), Religion (2%).
Who are Quality Care Home Facilities's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2020: Christs Church of the Valley Inc ($10k), Arizona Fca ($10k).
Where is Quality Care Home Facilities based?
Quality Care Home Facilities is based in AZ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Quality Care Home Facilities’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home