Skip to content
Pyxera Global Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Pyxera Global Inc

To reinvent how public, private and social interests converge to address global challenges.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Pyxera Global Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Charities Aid Foundation America, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’17
1
’18
2
’19
3
’20
6
’21
10
’22
1
’23
1
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$4.2MInternational$496kEnvironment$459kEducation$282kCommunity Improvement$147kSocial Science$109kYouth Development$105kEmployment$70k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $1,677,916, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,129,998 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $452,082 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$1,677,916
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION$1,677,916
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 20% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WELMI INC: $184k → 10%VENTURE WELL: $19k → 12%GLOBAL MAMAS: $50k → 11%THREAD INTERNATIONAL: $159k → 11%KORNGOLD CONSULTING: $43k → 17%GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $262k → 14%CIRCULAR MATTERS: $11k → 13%GULF OF ALASKA KEEPER: $150k → 10%KAWERAK: $23k → 20%CRESPIN ENTERPRISES INC: $55k → 4%CRDF GLOBAL: $33k → 7%CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION: $1.7M → 9%LA LOUISIANNE CONSULTING LLC: $30k → 17%WELMI INC: $46k → 10%VENTURE WELL: $19k → 12%THREAD INTERNATIONAL: $23k → 11%KORNGOLD CONSULTING LLC: $27k → 17%Global Business School Network: $130k → 14%KAWERAK: $15k → 20%CRESPIN ENTERPRISES INC: $42k → 4%CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION: $1.6M → 9%60 DECIBELS: $109k → 17%GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $61k → 14%CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 9%60 DECIBELS: $105k → 17%CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION: $791k → 9%CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION: $471k → 9%CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION: $216k → 9%CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION: $119k → 9%GLOBAL IMPACT: $11k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
MT
MI
NY
MA
PA
VA
DE
DC
LA
GA
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $452k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$391k · 86% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: USAID BELARUS SUBAWARD/MANAGEMENT & TRAINING

South Asia$62k · 14% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: MANAGEMENT & TRAINING

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 77% of Pyxera Global Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Pyxera Global Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 9 repeat orgs$418k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$1.2M
$418k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+4%

Still filing today

44%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalArts & CultureEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $322k · revenue +44%
  • H
    HATCH
    2× · 2021–2022 · $48k · revenue +46%
  • NC
    National Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $38k · revenue +132%

Funded once

  • GO
    Gulf of Alaska Keeper Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +692% · 73% of their budget
  • GB
    GLOBAL BUSINESS SCHOOL NETWORK
    one grant, 2017 · $130k · revenue -35%
  • WI
    WOMEN IN PROGRESS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Impact Investing Network Inc

The global impact investing network, inc. is dedicated to increasing the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet. impact investments are investments made into companies,…

Philanthropy
2
Global Greengrants Fund

Global greengrants fund seeds grassroots environmental action and social justice through small grants. we support change from the ground up by channeling donations to local projects and grassroots campaigns for environmental justice around…

Environment
3
Global Fairness Initiative

The global fairness initiative (gfi) promotes a more equitable, sustainable approach to economic development for the world's working poor by advancing fair wages, equal access to markets, and balanced public policy to ensure a more just,…

International
4
Global Entrepreneurship Network

The global entrepreneurship network operates programs in 180 countries aimed at making it easier for anyone, anywhere to start and scale a business. by fostering deeper cross-border collaboration between entrepreneurs, researchers,…

Education
5
Global Financial Integrity

Global Financial Integrity works to curtail illicit financial flows by conducting groundbreaking research, promoting pragmatic policy solutions, and advising governments.

International
6
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
7
Gavi Alliance

To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.

International
8
Global Partners
Human Services
9
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
10
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
11
Global Communities

Global communities brings together local ingenuity and global insights to save lives and secure strong futures.

International
12
World Coffee Research

World coffee research unites the global coffee industry to drive science-based agricultural solutions to urgently secure a diverse and sustainable supply of quality coffee today and for generations to come. our mission is to grow, protect,…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Impact; the most unlike its peers is Gulf of Alaska Keeper Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $5,885,496 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICAWELMI INC: $229,731 · OtherWELMI INC60 DECIBELS INC: $214,000 · Other60 DECIBELS I…THREAD INTERNATIONAL: $181,301 · OtherTHREAD INTERN…CRESPIN ENTERPRISES INC DBA COLLABORATEUP: $96,869 · OtherCRESPIN ENTER…KORNGOLD CONSULTING: $70,020 · OtherKORNGOLD CONS…KAWERAK INC: $37,723 · OtherLA LOUISIANNE CONSULTING LLC: $30,000 · Other+1 more: $11,138 · OtherGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $322,112 · International+1 more: $10,842 · InternationalGLOBAL BUSINESS SCHOOL NETWORK: $130,491 · EducationNational Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance Inc: $38,498 · EducationSavannah College of Art and DesignInc: $14,000 · EducationGulf of Alaska Keeper Inc: $150,000 · EnvironmentWOMEN IN PROGRESS INC: $49,792 · Community ImprovementHATCH: $48,468 · Arts & CultureUS CIVILIAN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $32,800 · Science & Tech
Philanthropy$5,885,496Other$870,782International$332,954Education$182,989Environment$150,000Community Improvement$49,792Arts & Culture$48,468Science & Tech$32,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $5,885,496 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $322,112 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGulf of Alaska Keeper Inc: $150,000 over 1y, 73% of budgetGLOBAL BUSINESS SCHOOL NETWORK: $130,491 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetWOMEN IN PROGRESS INC: $49,792 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetHATCH: $48,468 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetNational Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance Inc: $38,498 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKAWERAK INC: $37,723 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUS CIVILIAN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $32,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSavannah College of Art and DesignInc: $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Impact: $10,842 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pyxera Global Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pyxera Global Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 38%
  • National Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance Inc: 38% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pyxera Global’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home