Skip to content
Pure Hands Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Pure Hands Inc

Pure Hands, Inc.s mission is preservation of human lives by elimination of hunger through detection, prevention and treatment of malnutrition.

$205M
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$900kArts & Culture$245kInternational$193kHuman Services$143kPhilanthropy$73kRecreation & Sports$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kCivil Rights$26kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $212,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $205,337,262 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $205,124,762 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $128k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$8.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAS NY$50,000
AMERICAN MOSLEM SOCIETY$35,000
ISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOC$25,000
ISLAMIC CENTER OF WHEATON$20,000
PALOS ISLAMIC CENTER$15,000
AL-HUDA$13,000
MUSLIM AMERICAN SOCIETY MINN$10,000
ISLAMIC ASSOC OF CARROLTON$10,000
MUSLIM AMERICAN SOCIETY HOUST$7,500
MASJID ANNUR$7,000
ISLAMIC CENTER OF DETROIT$7,000
MAS GREATER LA$7,000
DEARBORN SPORTS CLUB$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 21%ISLAMIC ACADEMY OF KENDALLVIL: $18k → 10%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 21%MERCY BAKERY: $15k → 20%INTL COUNCIL FOR RIGHTS: $12k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
IN
NJ
CA
VA
MD
DC
AL
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $205M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$205M · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: RELIEF AID

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 18 repeat orgs$581k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +97% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
28

Total granted

$1.1M
$539k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
+17%

Still filing today

44%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureInternationalReligionHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MUSLIM AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEW YORK INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $214k · revenue +97%
  • MR
    MUSLIM RESPONSE USA FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT
    5× · 2019–2023 · $75k · revenue ×40
  • F2
    FOUNDATION 221
    4× · 2018–2022 · $73k · revenue ×14 · 31% of their budget

Funded once

  • WO
    WAQF OWAIS ALGARNI
    one grant, 2021 · $172k
  • IC
    IFTIN COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $48k
  • S
    SFUSAgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +94%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
2
Bangladesh American Society of Muslim Aid for Huma
Philanthropy
3
Islamic Ummah Relief Corp

Develop long-term developmental projects aimed at providing a sustainable living for poor communities as well as supporting needy widows and orphans

Human Services
4
Muslims of Long Island Inc

To help the people in need

Human Services
5
United Islamic Center of Arizona

UICApractice and present Islam by providing religious, educational and social activities for the local community in Arizona . Our goal is to develop and promote a socially responsible Muslim-American identity.

Religion
6
Muslim Community Center of New York Inc

Charitable social service providing food,education and charity to the needy.

Community Improvement
7
Muslim Foundation of America Inc

Community service

Religion
8
American Muslim Instituition

Human Rights Project

Arts & Culture
9
Arab American Community Networ

it is to unity the immigrates and give them access to education that will help them get settled and progress

Human Services
10
Masjid E Rahmat

Islamic learning center

Education
11
Multi Cultural Center Inc

There will be daily and weekly worship service available for the community members. The center will have an outreach activities

Religion
12
Ikmia Inc

Mosque

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Islamic Cultural Association; the most unlike its peers is Foundation 221. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN MOSLEM SOCIETY: $190,800 · OtherAMERICAN MOSLEM SOCIETYWAQF OWAIS ALGARNI: $171,948 · OtherWAQF OWAIS ALGARNIISLAMIC CENTER OF DETROIT INC: $71,450 · OtherISLAMIC CENTER OF DETROIT INCIFTIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $48,000 · OtherISLAMIC CENTER OF CHICAGO WESTERN SUBURBS: $45,000 · OtherMAS CHICAGO: $42,250 · OtherAL-HUDA INC: $40,000 · OtherTHE PRAYER CENTER TRUST: $38,000 · Other+24 more: $317,185 · Other+24 moreMUSLIM AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEW YORK INC: $213,500 · Arts & CultureMUSLIM AMERICAN SOCIE…ISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION: $66,049 · Arts & CultureISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSO…YEMENI AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $17,000 · Arts & CultureYEMENI AMERICAN ASSOC…+2 more: $14,500 · Arts & CultureMUSLIM RESPONSE USA FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $75,300 · InternationalMUSLIM RE…United Hands Relief Inc: $43,150 · InternationalUnited Ha…JUBAN CHARITIES INC: $12,000 · InternationalJUBAN CHA…WORLD MEDICAL RELIEF INCORPORATED: $9,000 · InternationalWORLD MED…FOUNDATION 221: $73,035 · PhilanthropyASSEMBLY OF MUSLIM JURISTS OF AMERICA: $24,397 · ReligionICD INC: $24,000 · ReligionSachse Muslim Society: $15,200 · ReligionBRONX MUSLIM CENTER USA INC: $6,000 · ReligionUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesISLAMIC ACADEMY OF KENDALLVILL: $18,000 · Human ServicesMERCY CHEFS INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesINTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $11,500 · Human ServicesUnited Mission For Relief & Development: $52,025 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$964,633Arts & Culture$311,049International$139,450Philanthropy$73,035Religion$69,597Human Services$64,500Public Safety & Disaster$52,025

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUSLIM AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEW YORK INC: $213,500 over 6y, 11% of budgetMUSLIM RESPONSE USA FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $75,300 over 5y, 19% of budgetFOUNDATION 221: $73,035 over 4y, 31% of budgetISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION: $66,049 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetUnited Mission For Relief & Development: $52,025 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Hands Relief Inc: $43,150 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetInternational Council for Rights and Freedom: $25,500 over 2y, 76% of budgetSFUSA: $25,396 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetASSEMBLY OF MUSLIM JURISTS OF AMERICA: $24,397 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetICD INC: $24,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISLAMIC ACADEMY OF KENDALLVILL: $18,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetYEMEN AMERICAN BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION: $18,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetYEMENI AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $17,000 over 1y, 48% of budgetSachse Muslim Society: $15,200 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMERCY CHEFS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJUBAN CHARITIES INC: $12,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $11,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetYEMENI AMERICAN MERCHANT ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetWORLD MEDICAL RELIEF INCORPORATED: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSLIM AMERICAN SOCIETY HOUSTON: $7,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMUSLIM AMERICAN SOCIETY OF GREATER LA INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBRONX MUSLIM CENTER USA INC: $6,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUSLIM AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSLIM RESPONSE USA FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION 221 ↗
  • Who funds ISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds United Mission For Relief & Development ↗
  • Who funds United Hands Relief Inc ↗
  • Who funds International Council for Rights and Freedom ↗
  • Who funds SFUSA ↗
  • Who funds ASSEMBLY OF MUSLIM JURISTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ICD INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ISLAMIC ACADEMY OF KENDALLVILL ↗
  • Who funds YEMEN AMERICAN BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds YEMENI AMERICAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Sachse Muslim Society ↗
  • Who funds MERCY CHEFS INC ↗
  • Who funds JUBAN CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds HAMTRAMCK CITY F C ↗
  • Who funds YEMENI AMERICAN MERCHANT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD MEDICAL RELIEF INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds MUSLIM AMERICAN SOCIETY HOUSTON ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Zakat Foundation …United Hands Relief I…Islamic Relief USAUnited Mission For Re…Dearborn Community Ce…The Nh FoundationThe Fountain of Knowl…The Tabbaa FoundationAmerican Muslim Commu…Texas Instruments Fou…Renaissance Charitabl…Verizon Foundation
The Zakat Foundation of AmericaIL23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Zakat Foundation of America · United Hands Relief Inc · Islamic Relief USA · United Mission For Relief & Development · Dearborn Community Center · The Nh Foundation · The Fountain of Knowledg Foundation · The Tabbaa Foundation · American Muslim Community Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pure Hands Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pure Hands Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pure Hands Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Pure Hands Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pure Hands’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home