· Private foundation
Jas Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 99% of JAS FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $266k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
- $250k+2 grants · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LITTLETON ACADEMY-EIN 86-3305014 | $250,000 |
| CTR FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORT-EIN13-384 | $250,000 |
| STUDENTS 2 SCIENCE INC26-4531439 | $50,000 |
| EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION 36-251812 | $50,000 |
| TELLURIDE FOUNDATION TAX ID84-15307 | $50,000 |
| Fr Flanagan's Boys HomesEIN47-03766 | $50,000 |
| THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION-EIN46-48848 | $25,000 |
| VNA HEALTH GROUP-22-2500029 | $25,000 |
| JUPITER MEDICAL CTR-EIN65-0132406 | $25,000 |
| UNDERDOG WARRIORS-EIN86-3903383 | $25,000 |
| ST JOSEPH'S CLINIC-FHTH-20-1682549 | $25,000 |
| MARY'S HOME-EIN26-3714519 | $20,000 |
| MAYO CLINIC-EIN41-6011702 | $20,000 |
| JOE NAMATH FDN-EIN81-3941360 | $10,600 |
| TUNNEL TO TOWERS-EIN02-0554654 | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
65 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAMEID35-0868185× · 2017–2021 · $850k
- CFCTR FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORT-EIN13-3843× · 2022–2024 · $750k
- LALITTLETON ACADEMY-EIN 86-33050143× · 2022–2024 · $750k
Funded once
- FHFROM HOUSES TO HOMES-EIN20-1682549one grant, 2021 · $15k
- MAMONDAY AFTER THE MASTERS-EIN-57-097one grant, 2022 · $10k
- ARAMERICAN RED CROSS-EIN53-0196605one grant, 2021 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The charitable activities of the Good Work Institute are designed to strengthen collaboration; address legacies of unequal power; and encourage a transition to regenerative ecological and social systems.
ISET-International catalyzes transformative changes toward a more resilient and equitable future. Through research, training and implementation activities, we improve understanding and elevate the level of dialog and practice as society…
Global Financial Integrity works to curtail illicit financial flows by conducting groundbreaking research, promoting pragmatic policy solutions, and advising governments.
Fund for Guaranteed Income ("F4GI") supports the research, infrastructure, and implementation of guaranteed income initiatives, including Compton Pledge, Long Beach Pledge, and Chicago Future Fund.
The Forum connects civil society experts to strengthen public efforts on arms transfers, security, and weapons issues, offering a hub for expertise, analysis, and resources.
The Guernica Centre for International Justice represents the interests of victims in national and international legal proceedings, putting in place transnational accountability strategies that seek to maximize the protection of victims'…
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
The mission of Morgan Memorial Goodwill Industries (Goodwill) is to help individuals with barriers to self-sufficiency to achieve independence and dignity through work. Not charity, but a chance.
Jobs with Justice is the nations only policy and advocacy organization dedicated to advancing workers rights to form unions and bargain with their employers for fair wages, benefits, and working conditions.
To help employee ownership thrive.
The Clean Energy Transition Institute (CETI) is an independent, nonpartisan research and analysis nonprofit whose mission is to accelerate an equitable clean energy transition in the Northwest.
New Roots Institute is a nonprofit empowering the next generation with knowledge and training to end factory farming.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nomi Network Inc and the most unlike its peers is Secret Smiles of Dayton Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jas Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.