Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Wisconsin · Public charity

PTA Wisconsin Congress

To promote quality education, a healthy school evironment and encourage community involvement

$11k
Granted FY2018
1
Grants FY2018
1
Organizations funded FY2018
0%
First-time grantees FY2018
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2018
$11,454
Largest grant, FY2018
$11,454
Organizations funded a year
1 to 1
FY2017 to FY2018
States reached, FY2018
1
Total assets, FY2018
$28k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2018, 0% of the organizations PTA Wisconsin Congress funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20181$11k0%
FY20171$11kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Education$22k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2018, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Mayville Joint School District$22,2002n/a

Compare PTA Wisconsin Congress with peer funders

About PTA Wisconsin Congress

How much does PTA Wisconsin Congress give?
PTA Wisconsin Congress reported 1 grants totaling $11,454 in its FY2018 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 1 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2018.
What does PTA Wisconsin Congress fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2018, its largest causes are Education (100%).
Who are PTA Wisconsin Congress's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2018: Mayville Joint School District ($22k).
Does PTA Wisconsin Congress fund new organizations?
In FY2018, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is PTA Wisconsin Congress based?
PTA Wisconsin Congress is based in WI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on PTA Wisconsin Congress’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home