Skip to content
Proverbs Three Nine Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Proverbs Three Nine Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$9kEducation$7kInternational$5kHuman Services$3kHealth$1kCrime & Legal$936Public Safety & Disaster$500Arts & Culture$429
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$400
Median grant
8
States reached
$13k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,685
Individual grant recipient$900
Deaf Missions$564
Jews for Jesus$552
Multnomah University$480
Individual grant recipient$400
Jesus Project$360
Care Net$188
Billy Graham Association$184
Every Home for Christ$180
Our Daily Bread$176
American Bible Society$172
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 66% of grant dollars ($18k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 34% that went abroad ($9k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 34% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Our Daily Bread: $176 → 18%American Bible Association: $172 → 22%Multnomah University: $480 → 6%Jews for Jesus: $552 → 10%Deaf Missions: $564 → 12%Multnomah University: $480 → 12%World Concern: $155 → 9%Care Net: $188 → 9%Saul Masih: $3k → 10%Our Daily Bread: $176 → 18%American Bible Association: $172 → 22%Jews for Jesus: $552 → 10%Deaf Missions: $564 → 12%Multnomah University: $480 → 12%Prisoners For Christ: $452 → 9%Care Net of Puget Sound: $188 → 9%Resurrecting Hope Christian School: $1k → 10%Our Daily Bread: $176 → 18%American Bible Society: $172 → 22%Jews for Jesus: $552 → 10%Deaf Missions: $564 → 12%Multnomah University: $480 → 12%Prisoners For Christ: $400 → 9%Care Net of Puget Sound: $188 → 9%Resurrecting Hope Christian School: $950 → 10%Our Daily Bread: $176 → 18%American Bible Association: $172 → 22%Jews for Jesus: $552 → 10%Deaf Missions: $564 → 12%Multnomah University: $468 → 12%Prisoners For Christ: $400 → 9%Care Net of Puget Sound: $188 → 9%PK Textbooks: $900 → 10%Our Daily Bread: $170 → 18%American Bible Association: $166 → 22%Jews for Jesus: $537 → 10%Deaf Missions: $549 → 12%Multnomah University: $178 → 12%Prisoners For Christ: $400 → 9%Care Net of Puget Sound: $182 → 9%Resurrecting Hope Christian School: $767 → 10%Our Daily Bread: $64 → 18%American Bible Association: $62 → 22%Jews for Jesus: $205 → 10%Deaf Missions: $209 → 12%Prisoners For Christ: $388 → 9%Care Net of Puget Sound: $70 → 9%Prisoners For Christ: $148 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
OR
IA
PA
CA
CO
NC
FL

Beyond the US: 34% of all-years giving ($9k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Pakistan$5k · 4 grants
Afghanistan$4k · 4 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$25k · 12 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$25k
$155

Still filing today

25%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MULTNOMAH UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +3%
  • RM
    RBC MINISTRIES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $938 · revenue +41%
  • CN
    Care Net Pregnancy & Family Services of Puget Sound
    5× · 2020–2024 · $816 · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • WC
    World Concern
    one grant, 2024 · $155
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $4,950 · OtherIndividual grant recipientResurrecting Hope Christian School: $3,117 · OtherResurrecting Hope Christian SchoolDEAF MISSIONS INC: $3,014 · OtherDEAF MISSIONS INCJEWS FOR JESUS: $2,950 · OtherJEWS FOR JESUSIndividual grant recipient: $2,188 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJesus Project: $1,924 · OtherJesus ProjectBilly Graham Association: $981 · OtherEvery Home for Christ: $961 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $900 · Other+4 more: $1,567 · Other+4 moreMULTNOMAH UNIVERSITY: $2,086 · EducationRBC MINISTRIES: $938 · ReligionAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $172 · ReligionCare Net Pregnancy & Family Services of Puget Sound: $816 · Health
Other$22,552Education$2,086Religion$1,110Health$816

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMULTNOMAH UNIVERSITY: $2,086 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRBC MINISTRIES: $938 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCare Net Pregnancy & Family Services of Puget Sound: $816 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $172 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MULTNOMAH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds RBC MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Care Net Pregnancy & Family Services of Puget Sound ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Proverbs Three Nine Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Proverbs Three Nine Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Proverbs Three Nine Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Proverbs Three Nine Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Proverbs Three Nine’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home