Delaware · Public charity
Prostate Cancer Research Inc
The organization's has 6 core goals to guide their decision making. The first goal is to become the gold standard for prostate cancer research. Goal 2 is to strengthen their credibility and reputation among the research community. Goal 3 is to form partnerships and build bridges between the scientific community, government, the…
- $220k
- Granted FY2023
- 3
- Itemized grants FY2023
- 3
- Organizations funded FY2023
- Itemized, FY2023
- $196k
- The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
- Median grant, FY2023
- $63,182
- Largest grant, FY2023
- $97,120
- States reached, FY2023
- 3
- Total assets, FY2023
- $31k
Top grantees
Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.
| Grantee | Total granted | Years | Share of their budget |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc | $97,120 | 1 | 0% |
| Clark Atlanta University Inc | $63,182 | 1 | 0% |
Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($36k), not named here.
About Prostate Cancer Research Inc
- How much does Prostate Cancer Research Inc give?
- Prostate Cancer Research Inc reported 3 itemized grants totaling $196,128, out of $220,399 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2023 IRS filing.
- What does Prostate Cancer Research Inc fund?
- By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2023, its largest causes are Health (68%), Education (32%).
- Who are Prostate Cancer Research Inc's largest grantees?
- By total granted over FY2023 to FY2023: Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ($97k), Clark Atlanta University Inc ($63k).
- Where is Prostate Cancer Research Inc based?
- Prostate Cancer Research Inc is based in DE.
More from the funding graph
The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home