Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Propel Schools Foundation

The PROPEL SCHOOLS FOUNDATION supports the mission of propel schools: to catalyze the transformation of public education so that all children have access to high-performing public schools.

$714k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$471k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$7.8M
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $612,618 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $714,069 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $101,451 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $121k
  • $250k+1 grant · $471k
$121,459
Median grant
1
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROPEL SCHOOLS INC$470,985
PROPEL MONTOUR$121,459
PROPEL HAZELWOOD$13,977
PROPEL BRADDOCK HILLS$6,197
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PROPEL SCHOOLS INC: $808k → 11%PROPEL SCHOOLS INC: $604k → 11%PROPEL SCHOOLS INC: $601k → 11%PROPEL HOMESTEAD: $562k → 11%PROPEL SCHOOLS INC: $543k → 11%PROPEL SCHOOLS INC: $471k → 11%PROPEL SCHOOLS INC: $339k → 11%PROPEL SCHOOLS INC: $336k → 11%PROPEL SCHOOLS INC: $300k → 11%PROPEL SCHOOLS INC: $290k → 11%PROPEL SCHOOLS INC: $230k → 11%PROPEL SCHOOLS INC: $213k → 11%PROPEL PITCAIRN: $163k → 11%PROPEL PITCAIRN: $158k → 11%PROPEL SCHOOLS INC: $156k → 11%PROPEL SCHOOLS INC: $151k → 11%PROPEL EAST: $126k → 11%PROPEL MONTOUR: $121k → 11%PROPEL MONTOUR: $111k → 11%PROPEL MCKEESPORT: $103k → 11%PROPEL HAZELWOOD: $102k → 11%PROPEL SCHOOLS INC: $101k → 11%PROPEL MCKEESPORT: $95k → 11%PROPEL MCKEESPORT: $89k → 11%PROPEL EAST: $75k → 11%PROPEL SCHOOLS INC: $57k → 11%PROPEL EAST: $51k → 11%PROPEL SUNRISE: $48k → 11%PROPEL NORTHSIDE: $48k → 11%PROPEL MONTOUR: $45k → 11%PROPEL MONTOUR: $44k → 11%PROPEL MONTOUR: $42k → 11%PROPEL HAZELWOOD: $40k → 11%PROPEL NORTHSIDE: $39k → 11%PROPEL MONTOUR: $37k → 11%PROPEL PITCAIRN: $29k → 11%PROPEL HAZELWOOD: $27k → 11%PROPEL HAZELWOOD: $26k → 11%PROPEL SUNRISE: $22k → 11%PROPEL NORTHSIDE: $22k → 11%PROPEL HAZELWOOD: $20k → 11%PROPEL SCHOOLS INC: $19k → 11%PROPEL MCKEESPORT: $17k → 11%PROPEL MCKEESPORT: $14k → 11%PROPEL SCHOOLS INC: $14k → 11%PROPEL EAST: $14k → 11%PROPEL SCHOOLS INC: $14k → 11%PROPEL HAZELWOOD: $14k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.8M · 8 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
0

Total granted

$7.8M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    Propel Schools Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5.9M · revenue +15%
  • PC
    Propel Charter School-Montour
    9× · 2017–2025 · $419k · revenue +209%
  • PC
    Propel Charter School - Pitcairn
    8× · 2017–2024 · $370k · revenue +1%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Provident Charter School

    a Pennsylvania Charter School that serves elementary (Grades 2-8) Level students with dyslexia, a learning disorder that can adversely impact a students ability to read, write, and learn

    Education
    2
    Young Scholars of Western Pennsylvania Charter School

    To establish a unique, proactive alternative to traditional public education which provides an ideal international environment for the intellectual & social development of its students

    Education
    3
    Pennsylvania Steam Academy Charter School

    The goal of Pennsylvania Steam Academy is to make education fun, engaging and significantly streghthen the city and the region with an innovative approach to education

    Education
    4
    Spectrum Charter School Inc

    Charter School- Our mission is to provide a life changing enviroment where students and their families feel safe, comfortable, and achieve their highest potential. We envision every child being educated, with skills

    Education
    5
    Urban Pathways 6-12 Charter School

    Charter school providing education to students from sixth through twelfth grade.

    Education
    6
    Catalyst Public Schools

    Catalyst Public School is a tuition-free public school offering a school environment that prepares our scholars to be leaders and change-makers.

    Education
    7
    Compass Public Charter School

    Public Education.

    Education
    8
    Catalyst Academy Charter School

    Catalyst academy's mission is to create a world-class k-8 school where all children are prepared for college, career, and life.

    Education
    9
    Young Scholars of Greater Allegheny Charter School

    To establish a unique, proactive alternative to traditional public education which provides an ideal environment for the intellectual & social development of its students

    Education
    10
    Rise Charter School Inc

    Public Education.

    Education
    11
    Pocatello Community Charter School

    Public Education.

    Education
    12
    Pennsylvania Leadership Charter School

    To provide an academically challenging, knowledge-based curriculum, individually designed for each child's needs.

    Education

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Propel Schools Inc and the most unlike its peers is Propel Charter School-Hazelwood. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    8/8
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    Propel Schools Inc — $5,856,591 · EducationPropel Schools IncPropel Charter School-Montour — $418,768 · EducationPropel Charter School-MontourPropel Charter School - Pitcairn — $369,919 · EducationPropel Charter School-McKeesport — $346,699 · EducationPropel Charter School-East — $292,559 · Education+3 more — $485,870 · Education+3 more
    Education$7,770,406

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPropel Schools Inc — $5,856,591 over 9y, 4.4% of budgetPropel Charter School-Montour — $418,768 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetPropel Charter School - Pitcairn — $369,919 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetPropel Charter School-McKeesport — $346,699 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetPropel Charter School-East — $292,559 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetPropel Charter School-Hazelwood — $235,028 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetPropel Charter School-Northside — $127,011 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetPropel Charter School Sunrise — $123,831 over 9y, 0.5% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds Propel Schools Inc
    • Who funds Propel Charter School-Montour
    • Who funds Propel Charter School - Pitcairn
    • Who funds Propel Charter School-McKeesport
    • Who funds Propel Charter School-East
    • Who funds Propel Charter School-Hazelwood
    • Who funds Propel Charter School-Northside
    • Who funds Propel Charter School Sunrise

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

    Tickets for Kids FoundationPA17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Tickets for Kids Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Propel Schools Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2025
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph