Skip to content
Project Management Institute Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Project Management Institute Inc

Our mission: we are a community creating the products, services and experiences that power project success.

$12M
Granted FY2024still arriving
113
Grants FY2024still arriving
43
States reached
$6.3M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$43MCommunity Improvement$393kHuman Services$273kEmployment$232kMembership Benefit$224kInternational$213kEducation$136kScience & Tech$58kOther$0
02FY2024 · 113 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 113 grants below total $7,700,286, the rows itemized in this filing. The $12,174,768 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,474,482 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k102 grants · $797k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $112k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $213k
  • $250k+2 grants · $6.6M
$7,840
Median grant
43
States reached
$745M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$6,305,489
PROJECT MANAGERS WITHOUT BORDERS$273,075
FOUNDATION FOR GLOBAL COMPACT$112,500
CONCORDIA SUMMIT INC$100,000
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES$29,000
AGILE ALLIANCE$21,198
HOUSTON CHAPTER$13,821
SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA CHAPTER$13,770
LOS ANGELES CHAPTER$13,760
MEMPHIS TN CHAPTER$10,200
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE WORKFORCE AGENCIES$10,000
SAVANNAH GA CHAPTER$9,600
SOUTH ALABAMA CHAPTER$9,225
CHATTANOOGA CHAPTER$9,225
WICHITA KANSAS CHAPTER$9,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $273k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PROJECT MANAGERS WITHOUT BORDERS: $273k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $2.7M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$947k · 35% · 44 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

East Asia and the Pacific$616k · 23% · 29 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

South America$342k · 13% · 33 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

North America (Canada and Mexico)$318k · 12% · 24 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

South Asia$160k · 6% · 15 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

Sub-Saharan Africa$128k · 5% · 17 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

Central America and the Caribbean$65k · 2% · 7 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

Middle East and North Africa$63k · 2% · 7 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

Russia and Neighboring States$31k · 1% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$43M · 6 repeat orgs$3.3M to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 108 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$43M
$2.0M

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementEducationInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PM
    PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $43M · revenue +19% · 97% of their budget
  • GS
    GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $50k · revenue +57%
  • NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2021–2024 · $37k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1.9M
  • GS
    GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $78k
  • MM
    MARINER MANAGEMENT & MARKETING LLC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Project Management Institute Inc

Our mission: we are a community creating the products, services and experiences that power project success. our vision: a world where every project lives up to its full potential for positive impact.

Community Improvement
2
Project Management Network Pmn At Att

Project management network (pmn) is an at&t employee group supported by volunteers and is open to active management and non management employees who want to expand theit knowledge of project management discipline. pmn offers project…

Education
3
Denver Metro Pm Education Foundation Inc
Education
4
Meeting Professionals International

To provide for training and exchange of information between persons engaged in the profession of planning business meetings.

—
5
Procurement Professionals Alliance
Education
6
Presidential Management Alumni Association

PMAA engages in ongoing educational and developmental activities for alumni of the Presidential Management Fellows Program, the premier recruitment pathway for civil servants.

Employment
7
Meeting Professionals International Carolinas Chapter

The carolinas chapter of meeting professionals international is dedicated to the professional and personal growthof its members and the meeting industry through education, networking, and communications.

Community Improvement
8
Association for Managers of Innovat

Promote innovation and creative process.

Membership Benefit
9
Meeting Professionals International Rocky Mountain Chapter

Promoting the meetings and event planning industry in the Rocky Mountain Region and beyond.

Community Improvement
10
Meeting Professionals International Indiana Chapter Inc

To advance & educate the professional careers of meeting planners.

—
11
Northern New England Chapter American Planning Association

Educational Purposes

Education
12
Institute for Leadership in Capital Projects

To evolve the capital projects industry through sharing of knowledge for optimized leadership, delivery and performance.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Management Institute Austin Chapter Inc; the most unlike its peers is Harrisburg University of Science and Technology. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

80 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 80 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
73/80
Grantees still filing
34/80
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $43,134,856 · Community ImprovementPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION+18 more: $165,729 · Community ImprovementIndividual grant recipient: $1,872,019 · Other+91 more: $809,595 · OtherPROJECT MANAGERS WITHOUT BORDERS: $273,075 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION FOR THE GLOBAL COMPACT: $112,500 · InternationalCONCORDIA SUMMIT INC: $100,000 · InternationalGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $37,000 · EducationHARRISBURG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY: $8,000 · Education
Community Improvement$43,300,585Other$2,681,614Human Services$273,075International$212,500Education$95,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $43,134,856 over 8y, 97% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE GLOBAL COMPACT: $112,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONCORDIA SUMMIT INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $37,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAGILEALLIANCE CO PMI: $21,198 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPROJECT MANAGMENT INSTITUTE HOUSTON CHAPTER INC: $13,821 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA CHAPTER: $13,770 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE - LOS ANGELES CHAPTER INC: $13,760 over 1y, 11% of budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE: $12,181 over 2y, 20% of budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE MEMPHIS CHAPTER: $10,200 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE WORKFORCE AGENCIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE DALLAS CHAPTER: $8,880 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE NORTHEAST FLORIDA CHAPTER INC: $8,875 over 1y, 18% of budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE: $8,840 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetTHE PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE NJ: $8,775 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE AUSTIN CHAPTER INC: $8,760 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetProject Management Institute Washington DC Chapter: $8,740 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE CIC INC: $8,735 over 1y, 13% of budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS CHAPTER: $8,730 over 1y, 15% of budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE CRBC: $8,700 over 1y, 20% of budgetProject Management Institute Rochester Chapter: $8,700 over 1y, 11% of budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE CENTRAL VIRGINIA CHAPTER: $8,700 over 1y, 13% of budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE-SOUTHERN NEVADA CHAPTER: $8,700 over 1y, 18% of budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INST MASS BAY CHAPTER: $8,700 over 1y, 10% of budgetProject Management Institute Central Ohio Chapter: $8,700 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetProject Management Institute San Diego PMI-SD: $8,270 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE-WILLAMETTE VALLEY: $8,200 over 1y, 16% of budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE - WESTERN LAKE ERIE CHAPTER: $8,200 over 1y, 35% of budgetTHE PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE: $8,100 over 1y, 19% of budgetPMI Metrolina Chapter Inc: $8,015 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetHARRISBURG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE SOUTH FLORIDA CHAPTER INC: $7,875 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetProject Mgmt Instit NC Chapter: $7,825 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetALAMO PMI CHAPTER INC: $7,790 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE NYC CHAPTER: $7,770 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetPUGET SOUND CHAPTER OF THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE: $7,760 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetPMI PHOENIX CHAPTER INC: $7,740 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE - PORTLAND OREGON CHAPTER INC: $7,735 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetProject Management Institute Chicagoland Chapter Inc: $7,735 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetProject Management Institute - Silicon Valley Chapter Inc: $7,725 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE SACRAMENTO VALLEY: $7,710 over 1y, 14% of budgetSOUTHWEST OHIO CHAPTER OF PMI: $7,700 over 1y, 13% of budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE: $7,700 over 1y, 14% of budgetProject Management Institute: $7,700 over 1y, 24% of budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE: $7,700 over 1y, 23% of budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE NORTHERN UTAH CHAPTER: $7,700 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetPROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE: $7,700 over 1y, 9.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Project Management Institute Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Project Management Institute Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 130%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 117 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Project Management Institute’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home