Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Arizona · Private foundation

Procurement Professionals Alliance

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
2
Grants FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$3,395
Largest grant, FY2024
$3,395
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$216k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2024 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Airport Purchasing Group Inc$1,2501n/a

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($3k), not named here.

Compare Procurement Professionals Alliance with peer funders

About Procurement Professionals Alliance

How much does Procurement Professionals Alliance give?
Procurement Professionals Alliance reported 2 grants totaling $4,645 in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Procurement Professionals Alliance fund?
By grant dollars over FY2024 to FY2024, its largest causes are Youth Development (73%), Membership Benefit (27%).
Who are Procurement Professionals Alliance's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2024 to FY2024: Airport Purchasing Group Inc ($1k).
Does Procurement Professionals Alliance accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Where is Procurement Professionals Alliance based?
Procurement Professionals Alliance is based in AZ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Procurement Professionals Alliance’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home