Skip to content

Massachusetts · Public charity

Pro-Democracy Center

Provides grant funding and expert strategic support to charitable initiatives that promote civic engagement across the us.

$555k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2025
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$550,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$550,000
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$2.9M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2025 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Pro-Democracy Campaign$550,00012%

Compare Pro-Democracy Center with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pro-Democracy Center?

Find your warmest path to Pro-Democracy Center through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Pro-Democracy Center

How much does Pro-Democracy Center give?
Pro-Democracy Center reported 1 grants totaling $555,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing.
What does Pro-Democracy Center fund?
By grant dollars over FY2025 to FY2025, its largest causes are Public Benefit (100%).
Who are Pro-Democracy Center's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2025 to FY2025: Pro-Democracy Campaign ($550k).
Where is Pro-Democracy Center based?
Pro-Democracy Center is based in MA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pro-Democracy Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph