Skip to content

· Public charity

Princeton Prospect Foundation

To facilitate the historic preservation of princeton eating clubs and to further the education of students belonging to the clubs.

$2.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$6.1MRecreation & Sports$1.7M
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $19k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $499k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.0M
$210,351
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRINCETON CHARTER CLUB$1,478,392
TIGER INN$493,747
CLOISTER INN OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$210,351
PRINCETON QUADRANGLE CLUB$150,000
PRINCETON TERRACE CLUB$139,000
COLONIAL CLUB$19,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PRINCETON CHARTER CLUB: $1.5M → 11%CAP AND GOWN CLUB OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY INC: $1.5M → 11%PRINCETON CHARTER CLUB: $839k → 11%TIGER INN: $494k → 11%TIGER INN: $488k → 11%PRINCETON CHARTER CLUB: $271k → 11%CAP AND GOWN CLUB OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY INC: $246k → 11%CLOISTER INN OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $229k → 11%CLOISTER INN OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $213k → 11%CLOISTER INN OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $210k → 11%TERRACE CLUB: $210k → 11%CLOISTER INN OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $207k → 11%PRINCETON QUADRANGLE CLUB: $176k → 11%PRINCETON QUADRANGLE CLUB: $150k → 11%CLOISTER INN: $142k → 11%PRINCETON TERRACE CLUB: $139k → 11%PRINCETON CHARTER CLUB: $136k → 11%CLOISTER INN OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $135k → 11%PRINCETON TERRACE CLUB: $120k → 11%TOWER CLUB: $100k → 11%PRINCETON TERRACE CLUB: $100k → 11%THE TOWER CLUB OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $95k → 11%COLONIAL CLUB: $57k → 11%PRINCETON CHARTER CLUB: $50k → 11%COLONIAL CLUB: $24k → 11%COLONIAL CLUB: $19k → 11%COLONIAL CLUB: $19k → 11%COLONIAL CLUB: $15k → 11%COLONIAL CLUB: $14k → 11%THE TOWER CLUB OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.8M · 8 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
0

Total granted

$7.8M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PRINCETON CHARTER CLUB
    5× · 2019–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +775% · 38% of their budget
  • CA
    CAP AND GOWN CLUB OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $1.7M · revenue +243%
  • TI
    TIGER INN
    2× · 2021–2025 · $981k · revenue +148% · 46% of their budget

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Princeton University Club of Washington Dc

    Alumni organization

    —
    2
    Ivy Club

    To provide its members with excellent meals in a comfortable, supportive environment that helps them to flourish academically, to learn from each other, and to become leaders in their communities and professions.

    —
    3
    Princeton University Mem Fund Tr Uw Mary S
    Education
    4
    Princeton Internships in Civic Service Inc

    The fund provides grants to non-profit educational, environmental, public policy, legal service & social service organizations to support up to 10- week paid summer internships for princeton university students.

    —
    5
    Westminster Foundation At Princeton Nj
    —
    6
    The Penn Club of New York Inc

    The penn club of new york has been established to encourage and cultivate free interchange, social activity and good fellowship among alumni, faculty, staff, students and friends of the university of pennsylvania and to assist and promote…

    —
    7
    Princeton Prospect Foundation

    To facilitate the historic preservation of princeton eating clubs and to further the education of students belonging to the clubs.

    Education
    8
    Bryn Mawr Country Club Educational Assistance Foundation
    Education
    9
    Number Six Club

    The Number Six Club is a Nationally-affiliated Co-ed Literary Fraternity. Since our founding in 1889, we identify as a group which collectively aims to develop a cultured understanding of the world through discussion and debate. As a…

    Recreation & Sports
    10
    Harvard Club of New York City

    The harvard club of new york city ("the club") promotes social interaction among members who have been with harvard university as students or instructors, or who have received honorary degrees. the members can access the club's 70…

    —
    11
    The Philadelphia Club

    To maintain a club for social enjoyment

    —
    12
    The Trustees of Princeton University

    Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

    Education
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colonial Club of Princeton University Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tiger Inn. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    3
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    6
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    6/8
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    PRINCETON CHARTER CLUB: $2,773,286 · OtherPRINCETON CHARTER CLUBCLOISTER INN OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $1,135,903 · OtherCLOISTER INN OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITYTIGER INN: $981,411 · OtherTIGER INNPRINCETON QUADRANGLE CLUB: $325,500 · OtherPRINCETON QUADRANGLE CLUB+1 more: $148,184 · OtherCAP AND GOWN CLUB OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY INC: $1,714,644 · Recreation & SportsCAP AND GOWN CLUB OF PRINCETON UNIV…PRINCETON TERRACE CLUB: $569,000 · Recreation & SportsPRINCETON TERRACE CLUBTHE TOWER CLUB OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $200,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE TOWER CLUB OF PRINCETON UNIVERS…
    Other$5,364,284Recreation & Sports$2,483,644

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRINCETON CHARTER CLUB: $2,773,286 over 5y, 38% of budgetCLOISTER INN OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $1,135,903 over 6y, 27% of budgetTIGER INN: $981,411 over 2y, 46% of budgetPRINCETON QUADRANGLE CLUB: $325,500 over 2y, 24% of budgetCOLONIAL CLUB OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY INC: $148,184 over 6y, 3.4% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Princeton Prospect Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Princeton Prospect Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 70%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      7get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Princeton Prospect Foundation?

      Find your warmest path to Princeton Prospect Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Princeton Prospect’s filings →

      More from the funding graph