· Public charity
President and Fellows of Middlebury College
Through a commitment to immersive learning, we prepare students to lead engaged, consequential, and creative lives, contribute to their communities, and address the world's most challenging problems.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 88% of President and Fellows of Middlebury College’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $1,954,807 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $97,112,254 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $95,157,447 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $105k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $420k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Town of Middlebury | $870,158 |
| SUNY Research Foundation | $559,394 |
| Oregon Health & Science University | $132,986 |
| Shepherd Higher Education Consortium on Poverty | $125,000 |
| University System of New Hampshire | $90,953 |
| Town Hall Theater | $71,349 |
| University Of Vermont | $41,327 |
| Georgia Tech Research Corporation | $23,684 |
| The Ohio State University | $21,675 |
| Regents of the University of California | $18,281 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $154k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $170k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TOTown of Middlebury7× · 2017–2025 · $5.7M
- TRThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York3× · 2017–2025 · $599k · revenue +62%
- IGITHRIVE GAMES FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2024 · $308k · revenue -76% · 27% of their budget
Funded once
- GTGEORGIA TECH APPLIED RESEARCH CORPORATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $127k · revenue +156%
- PTPotomac Theatre Project Incone grant, 2017 · $106k · revenue -100% · 44% of their budget
- NBNU Borders LLCone grant, 2017 · $90k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively as a supporting organization to and for the benefit of the georgia institute of technology to foster and support education and scientific research and economic development…
To engage in charitable, scientific, literary, and educational purposes and to receive, hold, invest, and administer property and to make expenditures to or for the benefit of georgia institute of technology (git) and to support its…
To help our clients solve problems and address critical challenges to safely, effectively, and efficiently move goods and people throughout the world by applying the most advanced, leading-edge expertise, by a team of passionate and…
Provide administrative and other support services to academic programs sponsored by rochester institute of technology both in the united states and abroad.
The primary purpose of the association is to promote the educational programs of georgia tech through student body participation in "healthful exercises, recreations, athletic games and contests". the association "develops the young people…
Research Triangle Institute is one of the world's leading research institutes, dedicated to improving the human condition by turning knowledge into practice. Our staff of more than 5,300 provides research and technical (continued on…
It is the mission of the georgia tech foundation, inc., to: 1. promote the cause of higher education in the state of georgia; 2. receive and manage financial donations received by the foundation for support and enhancement of the georgia…
To promote, encourage, and market scientific research by the faculty, staff and students solely for the benefit of virginia polytechnic institute and state university (virginia tech).
To provide distinctive and relevant education in an environment of scientific, technological, and professional knowledge creation and innovation.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgia Tech Research Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Ithrive Games Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
- Who funds ITHRIVE GAMES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Take This Inc ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA TECH APPLIED RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD HIGHER EDUCATION CONSORTIUM ON POVERTY INC ↗
- Who funds Potomac Theatre Project Inc ↗
- Who funds TRI-VALLEY TRANSIT INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds POINT PARK UNIVERSITY ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization President and Fellows of Middlebury College funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Tri-Valley Transit Inc — 81% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.