Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Preserve Michigans Future Fund

To operate exclusively for the promotion of civic action and social welfare by promoting the common good and general welfare of the residents of, and visitors to the State of Michigan; to support public policies on the federal, state, and local levels, that will bring about civic betterments and social improvements to Michigan residents;…

$516k
Granted FY2022
11
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$280k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212022.

Public Benefit$430kPhilanthropy$25kFood & Nutrition$20kRecreation & Sports$10kYouth Development$10kReligion$10kHuman Services$6k
02FY2022 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 11 grants below total $505,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $516,340 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $11,340 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
  • $250k+1 grant · $280k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$81k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTEGRITY IN GOVERNMENT FUND$280,000
MICHIGAN REPUBLICAN PARTY ADM$80,000
BUILDING A BETTER ECONOMY$50,000
UNITED WAY OF CLARE COUNTY$25,000
CITIZENS FOR TRADITIONAL VALU$10,000
MICHIGAN TRAILS AND GREENWAYS$10,000
ANGELS OF ACTION INC$10,000
ST DOMINIC CATHOLIC PARISH$10,000
WAYNE CO SHERIFF YOUTH & SENI$10,000
CLARE AREA WEEKEND BACKPACK P$10,000
FAIR MAPS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNITED WAY OF CLARE COUNTY: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Defend Your Vote

To oppose a Michigan ballot measure

2
Michigan Rising Action

Michigan Rising Action is focused on holding special interest networks accountable and advancing conservative principles. We're fighting for limited government, lowering taxes, fighting government over-regulation that stifles freedom, free…

3
Voters for Transparency and Term Limits

To operate exclusively for the promotion of civic action and social welfare by promoting the common good and general welfare of the residents of, and visitors to the State of Michigan; to support public policies on the federal, state, and…

4
Accountability for Government Fund Inc

To operate exclusively for the promotion of civic action and social welfare by promoting the common good and general welfare of the residents of and visitors to the State of Michigan; to support public policies on the Federal State and…

5
Elevated Voices Inc

Voter education around policy

6
Making Government Accountable
Philanthropy
7
Put Progress First

To operate exclusively for the promotion of civic action and social welfare by promoting the common good and general welfare of the residents of, and visitors to, the State of Michigan; To support public policies on the federal, state, and…

8
Protecting Michigans Future Fund

To operate exclusively for the promotion of civic action and social welfare by promoting the common good and general welfare of the residents of, and visitors to the State of Michigan; To support public policies on the federal, state, and…

9
Michigan Citizens for Better Health

To operate exclusively for the promotion of civic action and social welfare by promoting the common good and general welfare of the residents of, and visitors to the State of Michigan; To support public policies on the federal, state, and…

10
Michigan Values

The promotion of social welfare in Michigan by supporting public policies on the federal, state, and local levels that will bring about economic development, business growth, civic betterments, and social improvements to Michigan…

11
Michigan Voting Rights Foundation

To ensure free and fair elections by helping create more just and representative electoral districts across the State of Michigan

Civil Rights
12
Michigan Center of Accountability for Republicans

Social welfare and issue advocacy

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wayne County Sheriffs Youth and the most unlike its peers is Citizens for Traditional Values. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INTEGRITY IN GOVERNMENT FUND — $280,000 · Civil RightsINTEGRITY IN GOVERNMENT FUNDMICHIGAN REPUBLICAN PARTY — $80,000 · OtherMICHIGAN REPUBLICAN PARTYBuilding a Better Economy — $50,000 · OtherBuilding a Better EconomyCLARE AREA WEEKEND BACKPACK PROGRAM INC — $10,000 · OtherCLARE AREA WEEKEND BACKPACK PROGRAM INCCitizens for Traditional Values — $10,000 · OtherCitizens for Traditional ValuesST DOMINIC CATHOLIC PARISH — $10,000 · OtherST DOMINIC CATHOLIC PARISHFAIR Maps — $10,000 · OtherFAIR MapsMICHIGAN DEP OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES — $6,355 · OtherUNITED WAY OF CLARE COUNTY — $25,000 · Human ServicesMICHIGAN TRAILS & GREENWAYS ALLIANCE — $10,000 · Arts & CultureWAYNE COUNTY SHERIFFS YOUTH — $10,000 · Arts & CultureANGELS OF ACTION INC — $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Civil Rights$280,000Other$176,355Human Services$25,000Arts & Culture$20,000Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINTEGRITY IN GOVERNMENT FUND — $280,000 over 1y, 57% of budgetBuilding a Better Economy — $50,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CLARE COUNTY — $25,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetCitizens for Traditional Values — $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetMICHIGAN TRAILS & GREENWAYS ALLIANCE — $10,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetWAYNE COUNTY SHERIFFS YOUTH — $10,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetFAIR Maps — $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetANGELS OF ACTION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Preserve Michigans Future Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Preserve Michigans Future Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Preserve Michigans Future Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $19k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph