Skip to content
Presbyterian Villages of Michigan Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Presbyterian Villages of Michigan Foundation

The PVM Foundation sustains and advances the mission of Presbyterian Villages of Michigan by providing philanthropic support for benevolent care, wellness programs, innovative projects and residences for seniors of all faiths.

$5.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2.3M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$6.1MHuman Services$4.1MHousing & Shelter$214kPublic Benefit$31kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 26 grants below total $4,349,849, the rows itemized in this filing. The $5,653,006 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,303,157 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $253k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $279k
  • $250k+2 grants · $3.8M
$11,468
Median grant
1
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Presbyterian Villages of Michigan$2,275,000
The Village of Westland$1,487,671
The Village of East Harbor$226,200
Perry Farm Development Company$52,940
The Village of Rosebush Manor$47,705
Weinberg Green House$34,591
Presbyterian Village North$34,077
Hartford Village$27,137
The Thome Rivertown Senior Apartments$24,633
The Village of Woodbridge$19,196
The Village of Our Saviour's Manor$18,525
The Village of Warren Glenn$13,923
The Village of Redford$11,468
The Village of Brush Park Manor Paradise Valley$11,215
The Village of St Martha's$10,329
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $3.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Presbyterian Village North: $34k → 8%The Village of Warren Glenn: $14k → 10%The Village of Rosebush Manor: $48k → 19%The Village of Westland: $1.5M → 21%Presbyterian Villages of Michigan: $2.3M → 8%The Village of Brush Park Manor Paradise Valley: $11k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Harbor Area Housing

Provide services to low income senior adults

Housing & Shelter
2
Presbyterian Villages of Michigan Foundation

The PVM Foundation sustains and advances the mission of Presbyterian Villages of Michigan by providing philanthropic support for benevolent care, wellness programs, innovative projects and residences for seniors of all faiths.

Human Services
3
Garden Path Elder Living Inc

Garden Path Elder Living operates a residential care home for elders that provide assistance with daily living and nursing oversight.

Human Services
4
Presbyterian Manor Inc

To provide high quality care for seniors in North Texas.

Human Services
5
McDonald Presbyterian Senior Housing in

HUD subsidized affordable housing with supportive services for low income seniors who meet the income eligibility requirements of the HUD 202 Section 8 program.SeniorCare Network manages this community and provides or assists in the…

Housing & Shelter
6
Shoreview Senior Residence Dba Scandia Shores

Care for the elderly

Housing & Shelter
7
Bridgewater Village Inc

Retirement housing

Housing & Shelter
8
Pittsboro Christian Village

Pittsboro Christian Village is a caring and compassionate continuing care retirement community for the Lord's people during their senior years. We provide our resident's spiritual and physical well-being, guided by biblical principles to…

—
9
Plum Presbyterian Supportive Housing in

HUD subsidized affordable housing with supportive services for low income seniors who meet the income eligibility requirements of the HUD 202 Section 8 program.SeniorCare Network manages this community and provides or assists in the…

Housing & Shelter
10
Providence Place Inc

Providence Place offers independent living rental apartments for seniors seeking an active and independent senior housing community.

Housing & Shelter
11
Marys Meadow at Providence Place Inc

Mary's meadow at providence place offers long-term care, rehabilitation and spiritual support for the elderly.

—
12
Pitman Manor Inc

Compassionately serving in community so that all are free to choose abundant life.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Peace Presbyterian Village; the most unlike its peers is Rosebush Interfaith Retirement Community. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
13/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Presbyterian Villages of Michigan: $2,275,000 · Human ServicesPresbyterian Villages of MichiganPresbyterian Village Westland: $1,487,671 · Human ServicesPresbyterian Village Westland+4 more: $106,920 · Human ServicesPresbyterian Village East: $226,200 · HealthPERRY FARM DEVELOPMENT CO: $52,940 · Housing & ShelterHARTFORD VILLAGE: $27,137 · Housing & ShelterRivertown Neighborhood Senior Non Profit Housing: $24,633 · Housing & ShelterOur Saviour's Manor Senior Nonprofit: $18,525 · Housing & ShelterSt Marthas Senior Housing Corp: $10,329 · Housing & ShelterBethany Presbyterian Manor: $6,370 · Housing & ShelterPeace Presbyterian Village: $5,752 · Housing & Shelter+4 more: $10,469 · Housing & ShelterHarry & Jeanette Weinberg Green Houses at Rivertown Neighborhood: $34,591 · OtherThe Village of Woodbridge: $19,196 · OtherPresbyterian Village Redford: $11,468 · OtherHillside Apartments Phase II: $9,343 · Other+1 more: $1,635 · OtherMill Creek Senior Housing Corp: $6,361 · Crime & LegalHampton Farms Senior Housing Corporation: $5,538 · Crime & LegalPresbyterian Village - Holly: $9,771 · Religion
Human Services$3,869,591Health$226,200Housing & Shelter$156,155Other$76,233Crime & Legal$11,899Religion$9,771

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPresbyterian Villages of Michigan: $2,275,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetPresbyterian Village Westland: $1,487,671 over 1y, 26% of budgetPresbyterian Village East: $226,200 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPERRY FARM DEVELOPMENT CO: $52,940 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetRosebush Interfaith Retirement Community: $47,705 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetHarry & Jeanette Weinberg Green Houses at Rivertown Neighborhood: $34,591 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetPresbyterian Village - North: $34,077 over 1y, 66% of budgetHARTFORD VILLAGE: $27,137 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetRivertown Neighborhood Senior Non Profit Housing: $24,633 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetOur Saviour's Manor Senior Nonprofit: $18,525 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetFirst Presbyterian Church Housing: $13,923 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetPresbyterian Village Redford: $11,468 over 1y, 87% of budgetBrush Park Senior Housing: $11,215 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSt Marthas Senior Housing Corp: $10,329 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetPresbyterian Village - Holly: $9,771 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBethany Presbyterian Manor: $6,370 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMill Creek Senior Housing Corp: $6,361 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPeace Presbyterian Village: $5,752 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHampton Farms Senior Housing Corporation: $5,538 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetOakman Village Manor Senior Housing Development: $4,819 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPVM Kalamazoo Senior Non Profit Housing Corp: $2,671 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHarmony Village Senior Nonprofit Housing Corp: $2,204 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDELTA MANOR INC A NON-PROFIT HOUSING CORP: $1,635 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSpring Meadows II Senior Non-Profit Housing: $775 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Presbyterian Villages of Michigan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Presbyterian Villages of Michigan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Presbyterian Villages of Michigan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home