Skip to content
Presbyterian Seniorcare Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Presbyterian Seniorcare Foundation

To support Presbyterian SeniorCare and its tax-exempt affiliates by building relationships and creating a culture that values donors, philanthropy, volunteers, and stewardship.

$5.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.3M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$21MHealth$2.3MHousing & Shelter$1.1M
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $121k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $580k
  • $250k+2 grants · $4.4M
$154,110
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Presbyterian Seniorcare$2,297,823
Presbyterian Homes in the Presbytery of Lake Erie$2,058,090
Longwood at Oakmont$225,521
McDonald Presbyterian Senior Housing (Haveloch Commons)$200,000
Presbyterian SeniorCare at Home Inc (Dementia 360 Program)$154,110
Presbyterian Medical Center of Oakmont Pennsylvania Inc$49,965
Shenango Presbyterian SeniorCare$46,747
McKeesport Presbyterian Senior Housing (Fifth Avenue Commons$24,555
Plum Presbyterian Supportive Housing (PlumWood)$9,432
Presbyterian Medical Center of Washington Pennsylvania$5,050
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $18.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Longwood at Oakmont: $1.3M → 11%Longwood at Oakmont: $936k → 11%Longwood at Oakmont: $226k → 11%Longwood at Oakmont: $74k → 11%Longwood at Oakmont: $66k → 11%Longwood at Oakmont: $62k → 11%Presbyterian Seniorcare: $3.2M → 11%Presbyterian Seniorcare: $3.2M → 11%Presbyterian Seniorcare: $2.3M → 11%Presbyterian Seniorcare: $2.1M → 11%Presbyterian Seniorcare: $1.9M → 11%Presbyterian Seniorcare: $1.8M → 11%Presbyterian Seniorcare: $939k → 11%Presbyterian Seniorcare: $259k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24M · 11 repeat orgs$215k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
5

Total granted

$24M
$190k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
-1%

Still filing today

91%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    Presbyterian SeniorCare
    8× · 2017–2025 · $16M · revenue +60%
  • LA
    Longwood at Oakmont Inc
    6× · 2017–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +41%
  • PM
    Presbyterian Medical Center of Oakmont Pennsylvania Inc
    6× · 2017–2025 · $856k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • UH
    UNLIMITED HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue -11%
  • OS
    Oaks Supportive Housing Associates
    one grant, 2024 · $27k
  • EL
    East Liberty Supportive Housing Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Presbyterian Seniorcare Foundation

To support Presbyterian SeniorCare and its tax-exempt affiliates by building relationships and creating a culture that values donors, philanthropy, volunteers, and stewardship.

Housing & Shelter
2
Canterbury Place

Skilled nursing, long term and personal care

Housing & Shelter
3
Marys Meadow at Providence Place Inc

Mary's meadow at providence place offers long-term care, rehabilitation and spiritual support for the elderly.

—
4
Providence Place Inc

Providence Place offers independent living rental apartments for seniors seeking an active and independent senior housing community.

Housing & Shelter
5
Upmc Senior Communities Inc

Independent and assisted senior congregate living (see schedule o)

Health
6
Bethany Presbyterian Manor

Provides housing and related services to low income senior adults.

Housing & Shelter
7
Tandem Living

The christ-centered mission of tandem living is to partner with and support vibrant senior living communities where residents pursue their passions, deepen their relationships, prioritize their wellness, and live fully at every age.

Housing & Shelter
8
Presbyterian Manor Inc

To provide high quality care for seniors in North Texas.

Human Services
9
Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Care Foundation
Education
10
The Home for the Aged
—
11
Concordia Lutheran Ministries of Pittsburgh

Concordia Lutheran Ministries of Pittsburgh strives to serve our aging community with a continuum of high quality care-giving options, provided in a Christian environment, and to serve those with limited funds to the best of our ability.…

Housing & Shelter
12
Pittsburgh Lifetime Care Community

Continuing care retirement community fostering physical and financial security to seniors through independent living, personal care, memory care and skilled nursing care facilities.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Presbyterian Homes in the Presbytery of Lake Erie; the most unlike its peers is Unlimited Housing for the Elderly Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Presbyterian SeniorCare: $15,565,531 · Human ServicesPresbyterian SeniorCareLongwood at Oakmont Inc: $2,632,420 · Human ServicesLongwood at Oakmont IncPresbyterian Homes in the Presbytery of Lake Erie: $2,457,752 · OtherPresbyterian Ho…The Presbyterian Medical Center of Washington Pennsylvania Inc: $593,214 · OtherThe Presbyteria…+4 more: $179,556 · Other+4 morePresbyterian SeniorCare at Home Inc: $869,868 · HealthPresbyterian Medical Center of Oakmont Pennsylvania Inc: $856,438 · HealthShenango Presbyterian Seniorcare: $854,221 · Housing & ShelterMcDonald Presbyterian Senior Housing In: $205,000 · Housing & Shelter+5 more: $126,479 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$18,197,951Other$3,230,522Health$1,726,306Housing & Shelter$1,185,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPresbyterian SeniorCare: $15,565,531 over 8y, 11% of budgetLongwood at Oakmont Inc: $2,632,420 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetPresbyterian Homes in the Presbytery of Lake Erie: $2,457,752 over 6y, 12% of budgetPresbyterian SeniorCare at Home Inc: $869,868 over 5y, 26% of budgetPresbyterian Medical Center of Oakmont Pennsylvania Inc: $856,438 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetShenango Presbyterian Seniorcare: $854,221 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetThe Presbyterian Medical Center of Washington Pennsylvania Inc: $593,214 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetMcDonald Presbyterian Senior Housing In: $205,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetUNLIMITED HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetBADEN PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR HOUSING INC: $27,492 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetEast Liberty Supportive Housing Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetCastle Shannon Presbyterian Senior Housing Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetMckeesport Presbyterian Senior Housing Inc: $24,555 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetPlum Presbyterian Supportive Housing In: $24,432 over 2y, 7.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Presbyterian Seniorcare Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Presbyterian Seniorcare Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Presbyterian Seniorcare Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Presbyterian Seniorcare Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Presbyterian Seniorcare’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home