Skip to content
Preeclampsia Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Preeclampsia Foundation Inc

Preeclampsia foundation: 2025 impact statement saving lives and improving outcomes for mothers and babies in 2025, the preeclampsia foundation continued its unwavering mission to reduce maternal and infant illness and death due to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

$227k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$661kEducation$392kScience & Tech$244kRecreation & Sports$58k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $209,974, the rows itemized in this filing. The $226,774 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $16,800 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$49,999
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF$50,000
BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTE$50,000
UTHEALTH HOUSTON$49,999
ROWAN UNIVERSITY$49,975
YALE UNIVERSITY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 71% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTE: $50k → 16%STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDIC: $92k → 8%MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $73k → 28%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXES HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON: $50k → 16%OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSTY: $139k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHA: $29k → 13%V&L RESEARCH AND CONSULTING INC: $10k → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $29k → 14%ROWAN UNIVERSITY: $50k → 8%GEORGE WASHINGTOM UNIVERSITY: $19k → 4%THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT: $19k → 10%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $50k → 16%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $92k → 8%UTHEALTH HOUSTON: $50k → 16%OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $69k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHA: $22k → 13%V&L RESEARCH AND CONSULTING: $7k → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $22k → 14%ROWAN UNIVERSITY: $50k → 8%MASSACHUSSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL CENTER FOR GENOMIC MEDICINE: $50k → 16%STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF: $50k → 8%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $50k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHA: $7k → 13%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $7k → 14%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $50k → 16%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $50k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%MASSACHUSSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL CENTER FOR GENOMIC MEDICINE: $50k → 16%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
NC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$673k · 9 repeat orgs$379k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$673k
$329k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+41%

Still filing today

33%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    3× · 2017–2022 · $120k · revenue +67%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +6%
  • Northwestern University
    3× · 2017–2019 · $58k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • OH
    OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSTY
    one grant, 2018 · $139k
  • MM
    MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $73k · revenue +41%
  • OH
    OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $69k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
3
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
6
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
7
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
8
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
9
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
10
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
11
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
12
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Chicago; the most unlike its peers is Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSTY: $138,696 · OtherOREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSTYMASSACHUSSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL CENTER FOR GENOMIC MEDICINE: $100,000 · OtherMASSACHUSSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL CENTER FOR GENOMIC MEDICINEUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER HOUSTON: $99,998 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER HOUSTONTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $99,994 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYROWAN UNIVERSITY: $99,950 · OtherROWAN UNIVERSITYOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $69,348 · OtherOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHA: $58,333 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHA+3 more: $55,875 · Other+3 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $234,624 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND S…Baylor College of Medicine: $119,988 · EducationBaylor College of MedicineTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $58,332 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYL…The George Washington University: $19,046 · Education+2 more: $20,000 · EducationMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $72,870 · HealthMONTEFIORE…BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $50,000 · HealthBETH ISRAE…Northwestern University: $58,333 · Recreation & Sports
Other$722,194Education$451,990Health$122,870Recreation & Sports$58,333

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $234,624 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $119,988 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $99,994 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $72,870 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $58,333 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $58,332 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $19,046 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Preeclampsia Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Preeclampsia Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Preeclampsia’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home