Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Porijon Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$138k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$372kFood & Nutrition$128kHousing & Shelter$123kHuman Services$17kHealth$16k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $34k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $101k
$18,223
Median grant
States reached
$218k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
546 needy students in 53 universities 159 Depts'$101,315
1000S OF DESTITUTES IN 10S OF VILLA$18,223
84 poor families in 10s of villages$15,699
10s of teachersfamilies - livelihoodmedicine$3,086
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — across the US and around the world.

Your US giving — 0% of grant dollars ($0). The 100% that went abroad ($656k) is mapped below.

Beyond the US — 100% of all-years giving ($656k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Bangladesh$656k · 24 grants

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$198k · 5 repeat orgs$459k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
10

Total granted

$198k
$342k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $117k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • 1O
    1000s of destitutes in 10s of villages
    3× · 2022–2024 · $94k
  • 1O
    1000S OF DESTITUTES IN 10S OF VILLA
    3× · 2020–2025 · $75k
  • 1O
    10S OF TEACHERS FAMILIES FOR LIVELI
    2× · 2020–2021 · $14k

Funded once

  • 4N
    490 needy students in 39 universities
    one grant, 2024 · $74k
  • 3N
    398 needy students in 40 universities
    one grant, 2023 · $56k
  • 3N
    387 needy students in 40 universities
    one grant, 2022 · $49k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2020–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20202025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

546 needy students in 53 universities 159 Depts' — $101,315 · Other546 needy students in 53 universities 159 Depts'1000s of destitutes in 10s of villages — $94,147 · Other1000s of destitutes in 10s of villages1000S OF DESTITUTES IN 10S OF VILLA — $75,138 · Other1000S OF DESTITUTES IN 10S OF VILLA490 needy students in 39 universities — $73,824 · Other490 needy students in 39 universities398 needy students in 40 universities — $55,768 · Other398 needy students in 40 universities387 needy students in 40 universities — $49,178 · Other387 needy students in 40 universities287 NEEDY STUDENTS IN 50 UNIVERSITI — $48,940 · Other287 NEEDY STUDENTS IN 50 UNIVERSITI309 NEEDY STUDENTS IN 48 UNIVERSITI — $43,450 · Other309 NEEDY STUDENTS IN 48 UNIVERSITI+9 more — $114,696 · Other+9 more
Other$656,456

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph