Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Plurabel Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$700k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Environment$630kHealth$550kEducation$375kFood & Nutrition$350kAnimals$275kCivil Rights$275kInternational$150kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRYN MAWR COLLEGE$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK$50,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$50,000
OCEAN CONSERVANCY$50,000
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$50,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$50,000
HAWK MOUNTAIN SANCTUARY$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
PHILABUNDANCE$50,000
UNICEF$50,000
ACLU FOUNDATION$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 64% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK: $50k → 6%BRYN MAWR COLLEGE: $100k → 10%HAWK MOUNTAIN SANCTUARY: $50k → 11%Nature Conservancy: $25k → 12%PHILABUNDANCE: $50k → 22%Natural Resources Def Counc: $25k → 17%AMERICAN RIVERS PA: $100k → 14%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $50k → 7%CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK: $50k → 6%BRYN MAWR COLLEGE: $100k → 10%HAWK MOUNTAIN SANCTUARY: $50k → 11%Nature Conservancy: $25k → 12%PHILABUNDANCE: $50k → 22%UNICEF: $50k → 17%AMERICAN RIVERS PA: $100k → 14%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $50k → 7%Chester County Food Bank: $25k → 6%Bryn Mawr College: $25k → 10%Hawk Mountain Sanctuary: $25k → 11%Nature Conservancy: $25k → 12%Philabundance: $25k → 22%UNICEF: $50k → 17%American Rivers PA: $50k → 14%Chester County Food Bank: $25k → 6%Bryn Mawr College: $25k → 10%Hawk Mountain Sanctuary: $25k → 11%Nature Conservancy: $25k → 12%Philabundance: $25k → 22%UNICEF: $25k → 17%American Rivers PA: $50k → 14%Chester County Food Bank: $25k → 6%American Rivers PA: $50k → 14%PLAN OF PA: $50k → 6%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $50k → 22%NATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $50k → 17%American Rivers PA: $50k → 14%PLAN OF PA: $50k → 6%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $50k → 22%NATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $50k → 17%American Rivers PA: $50k → 14%American Rivers PA: $35k → 14%OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $50k → 14%OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $50k → 14%Ocean Conservancy: $35k → 14%Ocean Conservancy: $35k → 14%ACLU FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%Ocean Conservancy: $35k → 14%ACLU FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.0M · 12 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$3.0M
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+144%

Still filing today

67%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentFood & NutritionEducationAnimalsCivil RightsHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BM
    BRYN MAWR COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $375k · revenue +37%
  • OC
    OCEAN CONSERVANCY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $305k · revenue +97%
  • HM
    HAWK MOUNTAIN SANCTUARY ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $275k · revenue +128%

Funded once

  • NR
    Natural Resources Def Counc
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • AMERICAN RIVERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +144%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
4
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
5
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
6
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
7
The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…

Science & Tech
8
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
9
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
10
Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc

To protect the nature of massachusetts for people and for wildlife through education, land conservation, advocacy, scientific research, and habitat stewardship/restoration.

Environment
11
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
12
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philabundance and the most unlike its peers is Chester County Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $485,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $275,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYNATIONAL MS SOCIETY — $275,000 · OtherNATIONAL MS SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient — $275,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $100,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD+2 more — $40,000 · OtherBRYN MAWR COLLEGE — $375,000 · EducationBRYN MAWR CO…Philabundance — $175,000 · Food & NutritionPhilabundan…CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK — $175,000 · Food & NutritionCHESTER COU…OCEAN CONSERVANCY — $305,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSE…AMERICAN RIVERS INC — $25,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN RI…HAWK MOUNTAIN SANCTUARY ASSOCIATION — $275,000 · AnimalsHAWK MOUN…AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $275,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN …PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEASTERN PA — $175,000 · HealthUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $150,000 · International
Other$1,450,000Education$375,000Food & Nutrition$350,000Environment$330,000Animals$275,000Civil Rights$275,000Health$175,000International$150,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBRYN MAWR COLLEGE — $375,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $305,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHAWK MOUNTAIN SANCTUARY ASSOCIATION — $275,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $275,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $275,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEASTERN PA — $175,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetPhilabundance — $175,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK — $175,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $150,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRYN MAWR COLLEGE
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds HAWK MOUNTAIN SANCTUARY ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEASTERN PA
  • Who funds Philabundance
  • Who funds CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
  • Who funds AMERICAN RIVERS INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Plurabel Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph