Loading…
· Public charity
PLUMBING INDUSTRY PROMOTION FUND
Industry advocacy and promotion.
$155k
Granted FY2024
1
Grants
1
Communities
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
0165% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Health$125kHuman Services$77kPublic Benefit$49kOther$135k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
diseasedisabilitiesdedicatedchildren
2021
special forces
2022
covenantyounghomelessnesstraffickingdrop-inyouthstaff
2024
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$60,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
- THE OLIVIA HOPE FOUNDATION$60,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 7%. 79% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Children's Tumor Foundation
The children's tumor foundation is dedicated to ending neurofibromatosis (nf). our mission is to: a.) fund research, b.) increase public awareness, c.) support patients and families, d.) encourage establishment of nf clinics.
Health
2
Children's Cancer Family Foundation of
Raise money to support families and children suffering from childhood cancer.
Health
3
Childrens Cancer Therapy
To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.
—
4
American Cancer Society Inc
Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.
Health
5
Advance Care Alliance of Ny Inc
Acany offers comprehensive care coordination to people with intellectual and/or dev. disabilities.
Human Services
6
Sarcoma Foundation of America
We advocate for sarcoma patients by funding research, increasing awareness, & providing patient education.
Arts & Culture
7
The Paul Robert Carey Foundation
Cancer research and alternative treatment programs
Philanthropy
8
Hereditary Disease Foundation
To fund transformative research to find treatments, and ultimately a cure, for huntington's disease and other related disorders.
Health
9
Foundation for Quality Care Inc
Please see schedule o.educational conferences and seminars to disseminate information on issues affecting quality of care in long-term healthcare facilities.
Crime & Legal
10
Oncology and Kids Inc
To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.
Human Services
11
William Guy Forbeck Research Foundation
Promotes advances in cancer research through collaboration
—
12
The Children's Cancer Cause Inc
The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alzheimer's Foundation of America Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Michael J Fox Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$135,000Health$124,700Human Services$77,120Public Benefit$48,500
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds THE OLIVIA HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL FORCES ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NY HELMETS TO HARDHATS ↗
- Who funds HOPE & HEROS CHILDREN CANCER FUND ↗
- Who funds SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ACDS INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMERS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Association of Contracting PlumbersNY13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Association of Contracting Plumbers · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation PLUMBING INDUSTRY PROMOTION FUND funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE OLIVIA HOPE FOUNDATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~22 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.0× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 812185039 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on THE OLIVIA HOPE FOUNDATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 22 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 15% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Plumbing Industry Promotion Fund?
Find your warmest path to Plumbing Industry Promotion Fund through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines