Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Plano Isd Education Foundation

Helping all students in Plano School District achieve their full potential by providing financial support to educators and academic programs.

$728k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$656k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$5.8MHealth$464kHuman Services$226kFood & Nutrition$121kHousing & Shelter$29k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $656,086 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $727,758 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $71,672 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$656,086
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANO ISD$656,086
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $82k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CITY HOUSE: $74k → 5%CITY HOUSE: $8k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.6M · 7 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

$6.6M
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+50%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    PLANO ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5.8M · revenue +77% · 87% of their budget
  • LS
    LIFEPATH SYSTEMS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $262k · revenue +95% · 88% of their budget
  • CH
    CITY HOUSE INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $82k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • PW
    PLANO WILDCAT QUARTERBACK CLUB INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $11k · revenue +50%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Texas Food Bank Inc

To increase food access in Central Texas by providing nutritious food, leading hunger and poverty advocacy efforts, and transforming lives through programs, education, and innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
2
The Houston Food Bank

Houston food bank's mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided access to 136 million nutritious meals in 18 counties in southeast texas through our 1,600 community partners which includes food pantries, soup…

3
El Pasoans Fighting Hunger

To combat the hunger crisis in our region by strategically procuring and distributing nutritious food through community partners. because no one should go hungry.

Food & Nutrition
4
Feeding America Texas

Feeding America Texas operates exclusively for charitable purposes by supporting food assistance, hunger relief, and community aid initiatives for individuals and families experiencing food insecurity throughout Texas. The organization…

Food & Nutrition
5
Tarrant Area Food Bank

Tarrant Area Food Bank's (TAFB) mission is empowering our community to alleviate hunger and improve health. We value and embrace a culture of fairness and inclusion as fundamental to our vision of empowering communities where no one has to…

6
Medina County Food Pantry

Provide emergency food for those in need.

Human Services
7
Texas Briar Club Foundation

To provide support to needy families by providing funds for college tuition and weekend meal programs

Philanthropy
8
Pleasant Grove Food Pantry Inc

Pleasant Grove Food Pantry provides nutritious food to qualified residents of Pleasant Grove in southeast Dallas who are food insecure. Fighting food insecurity is the mission and intent of the organization. Services are provided by…

Food & Nutrition
9
Collinsville Food Pantry

To provide, or make available, food products or other items to its patrons, donees, and/or beneficiaries.

Food & Nutrition
10
Memorial Hermann Community Benefit Corporation

To implement solutions that promote good health for the individual, the health system and the community. we collaborate with others as well as create signature, evidence-based ways to improve the communities where people live, work, learn…

Social Science
11
University of North Texas Health Science Center At Ft Worth Health Systems

To improve the health and quality of life for the people of texas and beyond through excellence in education, research, clinical care, community engagement and to provide national leadership in primary care.

Health
12
Forney Food Pantry Inc

To feed the hungry people of Forney TX

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Texas Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Lifepath Systems Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PLANO ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $5,809,535 · EducationPLANO ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATIONLIFEPATH SYSTEMS FOUNDATION — $262,357 · HealthUT SOUTHWESTERN HEALTH SYSTEMS — $201,452 · HealthASSISTANCE CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY — $172,620 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $60,523 · OtherCITY HOUSE INC — $82,028 · Human ServicesMINNIES FOOD PANTRY INC — $60,523 · Food & NutritionPLANO WILDCAT QUARTERBACK CLUB INC — $10,547 · Youth Development
Education$5,809,535Health$463,809Other$233,143Human Services$82,028Food & Nutrition$60,523Youth Development$10,547

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPLANO ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $5,809,535 over 9y, 87% of budgetLIFEPATH SYSTEMS FOUNDATION — $262,357 over 4y, 88% of budgetUT SOUTHWESTERN HEALTH SYSTEMS — $201,452 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetASSISTANCE CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY — $172,620 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetCITY HOUSE INC — $82,028 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $60,523 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMINNIES FOOD PANTRY INC — $60,523 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPLANO WILDCAT QUARTERBACK CLUB INC — $10,547 over 1y, 20% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Plano Isd Education Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph