· Public charity
Planned Parenthood Great Plains
Uphold the standard for providing high quality sexual and reproductive health care.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
- $250k+4 grants · $2.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MISSOURIANS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOM | $750,000 |
| GLOBAL IMPACT | $750,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS VOTES | $420,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ARKANSAS & EASTERN OKLAHOMA | $403,383 |
| KANSANS UNITED FOR IMPARTIAL COURTS | $150,000 |
| KANSANS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOM | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 6% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $900k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ARKANSAS & EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC7× · 2017–2025 · $8.6M · revenue -69% · 59% of their budget
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS VOTES8× · 2017–2025 · $4.3M · revenue -14% · 95% of their budget
- CHCOMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC6× · 2017–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +258%
Funded once
- GKGeorge Kaiser Family Foundationone grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue 0%
- ACAFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCIL INCone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -54%
- BABETTERHEALTH A PLANNED PARENTHOOD PARTNERSHIPgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +109%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ppmw provides high-quality, compassionate healthcare, including reproductive care; promote sexual health; and advocate for reproductive rights and health equity for all.
Uphold the standard for providing high quality sexual and reproductive health care. provide education that promotes informed proud and authentic sexuality. change the culture through proactive advocacy to ensure equality in reproductive…
Ppaa promotes and protects reproductive health, rights, and justice.
To provide exceptional reproductive and complementary health care services, honest education, and advocacy for all.
Planned Parenthood of Montana empowers all people to make informed decisions and ensures the freedom to manage their own sexuality, and personal health by providing the highest quality confidential healthcare services, education, and…
To build and maintain financial support for planned parenthood north central states to advance and protect sexual and reproductive health care for all.
Planned parenthood of greater texas surgical health services was established and maintains operations to support and provide clinical health services to its patients in texas, as permitted by law in the organizations clinical settings.
To support access to high-quality, affordable reproductive health care services.
APGs mission is to assist accountable physician groups to improve the quality and value of healthcare provided to patients. APG represents and supports physician groups that assume responsibility for clinically integrated, comprehensive,…
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health provides comprehensive and complementary health care services in settings that preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of the individual, advocates…
To advance the planned parenthood mission internationally, including support for the provision and protection of sexual and reproductive health services and rights, and ensuring that all people have access to reproductive and sexual…
The mission of planned parenthood great northwest hawaii alaska indiana and kentucky is to support the lifelong sexual health of women and men, and foster a community where every child is a wanted child. we accomplish this through:…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma Inc and the most unlike its peers is Missourians for Constitutional Freedom. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ARKANSAS & EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS VOTES ↗
- Who funds COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC ↗
- Who funds Missourians for Constitutional Freedom ↗
- Who funds Global Impact ↗
- Who funds CLINICAL HEALTH NETWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION INC ↗
- Who funds KANSANS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOM INC ↗
- Who funds George Kaiser Family Foundation ↗
- Who funds AFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds BETTERHEALTH A PLANNED PARENTHOOD PARTNERSHIP ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Planned Parenthood Great Plains funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.