Skip to content
Planned Parenthood Great Plains at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Planned Parenthood Great Plains

Uphold the standard for providing high quality sexual and reproductive health care.

$2.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$14MCivil Rights$5.2MInternational$750kCrime & Legal$150kPhilanthropy$30k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.3M
$420,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSOURIANS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOM$750,000
GLOBAL IMPACT$750,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS VOTES$420,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ARKANSAS & EASTERN OKLAHOMA$403,383
KANSANS UNITED FOR IMPARTIAL COURTS$150,000
KANSANS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOM$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 6% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CLINICAL HEALTH NETWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION: $250k → 16%GEORGE KAISER FAMILY FOUNDATION: $30k → 15%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ARKANSAS AND EASTERN OKLAHOMA: $2.6M → 5%KANSANS UNITED FOR IMPARTIAL COURTS: $150k → 14%AFFILIATES CHIEF EXECUTIVE COUNCIL: $20k → 5%THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $454k → 13%GLOBAL IMPACT: $750k → 9%CLINICAL HEALTH NETWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION: $40k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ARKANSAS AND EASTERN OKLAHOMA: $2.3M → 5%THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $91k → 13%CLINICAL HEALTH NETWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION: $16k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ARKANSAS AND EASTERN OKLAHOMA: $1.9M → 5%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $20k → 13%COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC: $1.7M → 5%PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS VOTES: $1.3M → 5%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ARKANSAS AND EASTERN OKLAHOMA: $852k → 5%COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC: $850k → 5%COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC: $850k → 5%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ARKANSAS AND EASTERN OKLAHOMA: $599k → 5%PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS VOTES: $594k → 5%PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS VOTES: $538k → 5%PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS VOTES: $528k → 5%COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC: $503k → 5%PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS VOTES: $462k → 5%PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS VOTES: $450k → 5%PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS VOTES: $420k → 5%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ARKANSAS & EASTERN OKLAHOMA: $403k → 5%KANSANS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOM: $200k → 5%COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC: $141k → 5%KANSANS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOM: $15k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
PA
MO
VA
KS
NC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$18M · 6 repeat orgs$955k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$18M
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-14%
0%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $900k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ARKANSAS & EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $8.6M · revenue -69% · 59% of their budget
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS VOTES
    8× · 2017–2025 · $4.3M · revenue -14% · 95% of their budget
  • CH
    COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +258%

Funded once

  • GK
    George Kaiser Family Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue 0%
  • AC
    AFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCIL INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -54%
  • BA
    BETTERHEALTH A PLANNED PARENTHOOD PARTNERSHIPgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +109%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Planned Parenthood Great Plains

Uphold the standard for providing high quality sexual and reproductive health care. provide education that promotes informed proud and authentic sexuality. change the culture through proactive advocacy to ensure equality in reproductive…

Health
2
Planned Parenthood Alliance Advocates Serving Ak Hi Id in Ky and Wa

Ppaa promotes and protects reproductive health, rights, and justice.

Health
3
Planned Parenthood of Greater Washington and North Idaho

To provide exceptional reproductive and complementary health care services, honest education, and advocacy for all.

Health
4
Intermountain Planned Parenthood

Planned Parenthood of Montana empowers all people to make informed decisions and ensures the freedom to manage their own sexuality, and personal health by providing the highest quality confidential healthcare services, education, and…

Health
5
Planned Parenthood North Central States Foundation

To build and maintain financial support for planned parenthood north central states to advance and protect sexual and reproductive health care for all.

Human Services
6
Planned Parenthood of Greater Tx Surgical Health Services Inc

Planned parenthood of greater texas surgical health services was established and maintains operations to support and provide clinical health services to its patients in texas, as permitted by law in the organizations clinical settings.

Health
7
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health

Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health provides comprehensive and complementary health care services in settings that preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of the individual, advocates…

Health
8
Planned Parenthood North Central States

To support access to high-quality, affordable reproductive health care services.

Health
9
Americas Physician Groups

APGs mission is to assist accountable physician groups to improve the quality and value of healthcare provided to patients. APG represents and supports physician groups that assume responsibility for clinically integrated, comprehensive,…

Community Improvement
10
Planned Parenthood Global Inc

To advance the planned parenthood mission internationally, including support for the provision and protection of sexual and reproductive health services and rights, and ensuring that all people have access to reproductive and sexual…

Health
11
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest Hawaii Alaska Indiana and Kentucky

The mission of planned parenthood great northwest hawaii alaska indiana and kentucky is to support the lifelong sexual health of women and men, and foster a community where every child is a wanted child. we accomplish this through:…

Health
12
North Platte Nebraska Hospital Corp

To inspire health and healing by putting patients first -- always.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma Inc; the most unlike its peers is Missourians for Constitutional Freedom. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
3/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ARKANSAS & EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $8,617,446 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ARKANSAS & EASTERN OKLAHOMA INCCOMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC: $4,014,913 · HealthCOMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC+2 more: $310,556 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS VOTES: $4,276,565 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS VO…Missourians for Constitutional Freedom: $750,000 · OtherMissourians for Constitutional Fre…UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $564,473 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CH…KANSANS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOM INC: $215,000 · Other+2 more: $170,000 · OtherGlobal Impact: $750,000 · InternationalGeorge Kaiser Family Foundation: $30,000 · Philanthropy
Health$12,942,915Other$5,976,038International$750,000Philanthropy$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ARKANSAS & EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $8,617,446 over 7y, 59% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS VOTES: $4,276,565 over 8y, 95% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC: $4,014,913 over 6y, 18% of budgetMissourians for Constitutional Freedom: $750,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetGlobal Impact: $750,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCLINICAL HEALTH NETWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION INC: $305,556 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGeorge Kaiser Family Foundation: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCIL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetBETTERHEALTH A PLANNED PARENTHOOD PARTNERSHIP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Planned Parenthood Fe…
Planned Parenthood Federation of America IncNY13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Planned Parenthood Great Plains funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Planned Parenthood Great Plains. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Planned Parenthood Great Plains’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home