Skip to content
Planned Parenthood Advocacy Project Los Angeles County at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Planned Parenthood Advocacy Project Los Angeles County

Educate the public on reproductive choice and healthcare options and advocate for public policies that support access to reproductive healthcare and education.

$211k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$165k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Civil Rights$337kHealth$55kYouth Development$5k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $46k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $165k
$165,239
Median grant
1
States reached
$778k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Coalition to Protect$165,239
Equality California$45,900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 57% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Coalition to Protect: $165k → 8%Planned Parenthood Affiliate of California (PPAC): $10k → 12%Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA): $10k → 14%Abortion Access for All: $15k → 12%Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA): $10k → 14%Equality California: $10k → 14%Equality California: $10k → 14%Hispanas Organized for Political Equality - California: $26k → 14%Hispanas Organized for Political Equality - California: $20k → 14%Hispanas Organized for Political Equality - California: $18k → 14%Hispanas Organized for Political Equality - California: $13k → 14%Black Women for Wellness: $20k → 14%Black Women for Wellness: $10k → 14%Equality California: $46k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$146k · 4 repeat orgs$251k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +100% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$146k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+100%
+37%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $211k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HISPANAS ORGANIZED FOR POLITICAL EQUALITY - CALIFORNIA
    4× · 2020–2023 · $76k · revenue +100%
  • BLACK WOMEN FOR WELLNESS
    2× · 2021–2023 · $30k · revenue +100%
  • CF
    COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +104%

Funded once

  • AA
    ABORTION ACCESS FOR ALL
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES OF CALIFORNIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +58%
  • CL
    CALIFORNIA LATINAS FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
League of Women Voters of Los Angeles

The League of Women Voters, a nonpartisan political organization, encourages informed and active participation in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and…

—
2
California Black Womens Health Project

Educate and advocate to improve the health of Calfornia's black women and girls

Health
3
Access Reproductive Justice

The purpose of ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE is to remove barriers to sexual and reproductive health care and build the power of Californians to demand health, justice, and dignity.

—
4
Los Angeles Guild for Reproductive Health

Reproductive healthcare services.

Health
5
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network

To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.

Health
6
Californians to Protect Community Healthcare

To protect business transactions between health care facilities and provider groups with private investors from excessive government overreach in California through public education and advocacy

—
7
Planned Parenthood Advocates Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley Inc

PP Advocates is a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization. Our mission is to preserve and broaden access to reproductive health care through legislation, public education, and electoral activity.

—
8
Black American Political Association of California

Educate and advocacy

Civil Rights
9
California Human Trafficking Investigators and Prosecuters Asso
Crime & Legal
10
Latino Political Network
—
11
Stop Sb 525

To protect patient access to affordable healthcare in California.

—
12
Californians Against Job Losses and Higher Prices

Oppose Proposition 32 in the State of California on the November 5, 2024 ballot.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California Inc; the most unlike its peers is Safe & Health Youth Washington. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Protect Our Healthcare: $165,239 · Public BenefitProtect Our HealthcareHISPANAS ORGANIZED FOR POLITICAL EQUALITY - CALIFORNIA: $76,250 · Civil RightsHISPANAS ORGANIZED FOR POLITICAL …COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $20,000 · Civil RightsCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RI…EQUALITY CALIFORNIA: $20,000 · Civil RightsEQUALITY CALIFORNIAEquality California Issues PAC: $45,900 · OtherEquality California I…ABORTION ACCESS FOR ALL: $15,000 · OtherABORTION ACCESS FOR A…PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES OF CALIFORNIA INC: $10,176 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD AF…Safe & Health Youth Washington: $5,000 · OtherSafe & Health Youth W…BLACK WOMEN FOR WELLNESS: $30,000 · HealthBLACK WOMEN…CALIFORNIA LATINAS FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: $10,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA …
Public Benefit$165,239Civil Rights$116,250Other$76,076Health$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetProtect Our Healthcare: $165,239 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHISPANAS ORGANIZED FOR POLITICAL EQUALITY - CALIFORNIA: $76,250 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetEquality California Issues PAC: $45,900 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBLACK WOMEN FOR WELLNESS: $30,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEQUALITY CALIFORNIA: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES OF CALIFORNIA INC: $10,176 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA LATINAS FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Planned Parenthood Ac…
Planned Parenthood Action Fund IncNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Planned Parenthood Action Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Planned Parenthood Advocacy Project Los Angeles County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Planned Parenthood Advocacy Project Los Angeles County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Planned Parenthood Advocacy Project Los Angeles County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home