Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Plainview Area United Way

The organization assesses needs within the communtiy, assigns priorities and raises funds on behalf of local nonprofit human service agencies to meet those needs.

$110k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 52% of PLAINVIEW COMMUNITY CHEST INC FORMERLY PLAINVIEW AREA UNITED WAY’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEE CARE CHILD CENTER$25,000
YMCA$20,000
PLAINVIEW EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP$17,000
SALVATION ARMY$15,000
CRISIS CENTER OF THE PLAINS$12,800
Individual grant recipient$10,200
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $441k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%YMCA: $40k → 22%YMCA: $40k → 22%YMCA: $40k → 22%YMCA: $40k → 22%YMCA: $40k → 22%YMCA: $33k → 22%CRISIS CENTER OF THE PLAINS: $30k → 22%CRISIS CENTER OF THE PLAINS: $30k → 22%CRISIS CENTER OF THE PLAINS: $30k → 22%CRISIS CENTER OF THE PLAINS: $30k → 22%CRISIS CENTER OF THE PLAINS: $30k → 22%CRISIS CENTER OF THE PLAINS: $25k → 22%YMCA: $20k → 22%CRISIS CENTER OF THE PLAINS: $13k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 9 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$1.3M
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+30%

Still filing today

44%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WEE CARE CHILD CARE CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $335k · revenue +16%
  • PE
    PLAINVIEW EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP
    7× · 2017–2024 · $190k · revenue +13% · 100% of their budget
  • CC
    CRISIS CENTER OF THE PLAINS
    7× · 2017–2024 · $188k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • HC
    HALE COUNTY LITERACY COUNCILgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WEE CARE CHILD CARE CENTER INC — $334,800 · OtherWEE CARE CHILD CARE CENTER INCSALVATION ARMY — $126,700 · OtherSALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient — $115,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHALE COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS — $58,200 · OtherHALE COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENSIndividual grant recipient — $27,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $27,500 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PLAINVIEW — $253,300 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF …CRISIS CENTER OF THE PLAINS — $187,800 · Human ServicesCRISIS CENTER OF THE PLAINSPLAINVIEW EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP — $189,500 · EducationPLAINVIEW EDUCATI…HALE COUNTY LITERACY COUNCIL — $15,000 · EducationHALE COUNTY LITER…
Other$689,900Human Services$441,100Education$204,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWEE CARE CHILD CARE CENTER INC — $334,800 over 7y, 7.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PLAINVIEW — $253,300 over 7y, 4.7% of budgetPLAINVIEW EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP — $189,500 over 7y, 100% of budgetCRISIS CENTER OF THE PLAINS — $187,800 over 7y, 4.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEE CARE CHILD CARE CENTER INC
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PLAINVIEW
  • Who funds PLAINVIEW EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP
  • Who funds CRISIS CENTER OF THE PLAINS
  • Who funds HALE COUNTY LITERACY COUNCIL

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Plainview Area United Way funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $4k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph