Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pittsfield Anti-Tuberculosis Association

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$179k
Granted FY2022
10
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

International$484kHealth$322kArts & Culture$25kEducation$10kOther$0
02FY2022 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $101k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GLOBAL HEALTH COMMITTEE$55,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$43,000
JOHNS HOPKINS TIBET REFUGEE$20,000
Individual grant recipient$17,500
SHATTUCK PARTNERS$10,000
CARLOS PODALIRIO BORGES DE ALMEIDA$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
BERKSHIRE MEDICAL CENTER$5,000
NATIONAL TUBERCULOSIS CONTROLLERS A$5,000
VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%NARDELL FUNDING FOR LATRAVIATA: $15k → 8%UMASS AMHERST DR TSUNGDA HSU: $15k → 12%BERKSHIRE MEDICAL CENTER: $33k → 12%INTERNATL UNION AGAINST TB: $20k → 16%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $10k → 17%AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY: $5k → 14%NATIONAL TUBERCULOSIS CONTROLLERS A: $5k → 8%NJMS GLOBAL INST: $8k → 16%JOHNS HOPKINS TIBET REFUGEE: $25k → 19%BERKSHIRE MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 12%INTERNATL UNION AGAINST TB: $18k → 16%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $8k → 17%AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY: $5k → 14%JOHNS HOPKINS TIBET REFUGEE: $25k → 19%BERKSHIRE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $10k → 12%INTERNATL UNION AGAINST TB: $15k → 16%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $5k → 17%STOP TB USA: $5k → 14%JOHNS HOPKINS TIBET REFUGEE: $20k → 19%BERKSHIRE MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 12%INTERNATL UNION AGAINST TB: $15k → 16%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $5k → 17%JOHNS HOPKINS TIBET REFUGEE: $20k → 19%BERKSHIRE MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 12%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $43k → 16%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $4k → 17%JOHNS HOPKINS TIBET REFUGEE: $15k → 19%BERKSHIRE MEDICAL CENTER: $7k → 12%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $16k → 16%JOHNS HOPKINS TIBET REFUGEE: $15k → 19%BERKSHIRE MEDICAL CENTER: $5k → 12%GLOBAL HEALTH COMMITTEE: $60k → 16%VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $5k → 12%GLOBAL HEALTH COMMITTEE: $55k → 16%VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $5k → 12%GLOBAL HEALTH COMMITTEE: $50k → 16%VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $5k → 12%GLOBAL HEALTH COMMITTEE: $50k → 16%VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $5k → 12%GLOBAL HEALTH COMMITTEE: $50k → 16%GLOBAL HEALTH COMMITTEE: $40k → 16%SHATTUCK PARTNERS: $14k → 16%SHATTUCK PARTNERS: $14k → 16%SHATTUCK PARTNERS: $13k → 16%SHATTUCK PARTNERS: $10k → 16%SHATTUCK PARTNERS: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$774k · 10 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
5

Total granted

$774k
$57k

Still filing today

60%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
HealthRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GLOBAL HEALTH COMMITTEE INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $305k · revenue +3%
  • BM
    BERKSHIRE MEDICAL CENTER INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $71k · revenue +64%
  • SP
    SHATTUCK PARTNERS INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $58k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • NF
    NARDELL FUNDING FOR LATRAVIATA
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • UA
    UMASS AMHERST DR TSUNGDA HSU
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • LS
    LEMUEL SHATTUCK HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHNS HOPKINS TIBET REFUGEE: $120,000 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINS TIBET REFUGEEINTERNATL UNION AGAINST TB: $67,500 · OtherINTERNATL UNION AGAINST TBNJMS GLOBAL TUBERCULOSIS INST: $31,000 · OtherNJMS GLOBAL TUBERCULOSIS INSTIndividual grant recipient: $17,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNARDELL FUNDING FOR LATRAVIATA: $15,000 · OtherUMASS AMHERST DR TSUNGDA HSU: $15,000 · OtherLEMUEL SHATTUCK HOSPITAL: $12,000 · Other+6 more: $48,000 · Other+6 moreGLOBAL HEALTH COMMITTEE INC: $305,000 · Recreation & SportsGLOBAL HEALTH COMMITTEE INCBERKSHIRE MEDICAL CENTER INC: $71,370 · HealthBERKSHIRE MEDICAL CENTER IN…PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $59,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPRO…SHATTUCK PARTNERS INC: $58,370 · HealthSHATTUCK PARTNERS INCVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE-BERKSHIRES INC: $20,000 · HealthVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE-BERK…ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $31,500 · Education
Other$326,000Recreation & Sports$305,000Health$208,740Education$31,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLOBAL HEALTH COMMITTEE INC: $305,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetBERKSHIRE MEDICAL CENTER INC: $71,370 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $59,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHATTUCK PARTNERS INC: $58,370 over 5y, 22% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $31,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE-BERKSHIRES INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLOBAL HEALTH COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SHATTUCK PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE-BERKSHIRES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pittsfield Anti-Tuberculosis Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pittsfield Anti-Tuberculosis Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Volunteers in Medicine-Berkshires Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Berkshire Medical Center Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pittsfield Anti-Tuberculosis Association?

Find your warmest path to Pittsfield Anti-Tuberculosis Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pittsfield Anti-Tuberculosis Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph