Skip to content

· Private foundation

Picco Clairton Hs Scholarship Fd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$202k
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$633k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIV OF PITT BRADFORD FBO JASON COCHRAN$8,500
UNIVERSITY OF AKRON FBO QUA'JON MILLER$3,600
HOWARD UNIVERSITY FBO KHALAYA KNOWELL$3,000
SAINT VINCENT COLLEGE FBO MICHAEL WRIGHT$3,000
UNIV OF PITTSBURGH FBO ZACHARY ANDREW$3,000
KENT STATE UNIV FBO MARIBEL ENCARNACION$2,750
POINT PARK UNIVERSITY FBO MICHAEL SPENCE$2,159
UNIV OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO FBO ANTHONY$2,000
ROBERT MORRIS UNIV FBO DRAHCIR JONES$1,900
CHEYNEY UNIVERSITY FBO KEVIONNA JONES$1,700
PENNWEST UNIVERSITY FBO REYONEE WILLIAMS$1,500
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN FBO NORIS SO$1,500
COMM COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY FBO$1,000
CHATHAM UNIVERSITY FBO MAHLEK WILLIAMS$1,000
CHEYNEY UNIVERSITY FBO BRYANT BLAIR$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 38% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY OF PA: $2k → 9%COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY: $4k → 11%WASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE: $3k → 12%PENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $2k → 12%WESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $500 → 13%LOCK HAVE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1k → 13%CLARION UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $3k → 14%PENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 22%KENT STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%WHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY: $1k → 15%NORFOLK STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 19%PITTSBURGH TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $2k → 11%WASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE: $1k → 12%PENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $2k → 12%CLARION UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1k → 14%PENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 22%DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2k → 12%POINT PARK UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2k → 12%PENN STATE GREATER ALLEGHENY: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$83k · 17 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
46

Total granted

$83k
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+8%

Still filing today

12%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2021–2023 · $11k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $7k

Funded once

  • CC
    COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
  • CH
    Cierra Hillary PNC Bank
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $11,036 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $9,500 · OtherUNIV OF PITT BRADFORD FBO JASON COCHRAN: $8,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,500 · Other+74 more: $147,260 · Other+74 moreWASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE: $4,250 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $4,000 · EducationDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $1,750 · EducationPITTSBURGH TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC: $1,500 · EducationWHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY INC: $1,000 · EducationWESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $500 · Education
Other$189,296Education$13,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE: $4,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOINT PARK UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Picco Clairton Hs Scholarship Fd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Picco Clairton Hs Scholarship Fd. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Picco Clairton Hs Scholarship Fd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph