Skip to content

· Public charity

Phoenix Final Four Local Organizing Committee

The purpose of the PHOENIX FINAL FOUR LOCAL ORGANIZING COMMITTEE (ploc) is the operation and staging of the ncaa men's final four in order to generate economic impact in arizona through tourism and to provide positive experiences for student-athletes, alumni & visiting fans.

$215k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$102k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$120kPublic Benefit$102kFood & Nutrition$30kEnvironment$20kPhilanthropy$20kYouth Development$15k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $187,203, the rows itemized in this filing. The $215,219 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $28,016 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $102k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF PHOENIX$102,203
KEEP PHOENIX BEAUTIFUL$20,000
ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FDN$20,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$15,000
WASTE NOT$10,000
UNITED FOOD BANK$10,000
ST MARYS FOOD BANK$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 26% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CITY OF PHOENIX: $102k → 11%ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FDN: $20k → 14%WOMEN LEADERS IN COLLEGE SPOR: $50k → 15%KEEP PHOENIX BEAUTIFUL: $20k → 11%WOMEN LEADERS IN COLLEGE SPOR: $10k → 15%ST MARYS FOOD BANK: $10k → 11%WASTE NOT: $10k → 11%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $15k → 11%UNITED FOOD BANK: $10k → 11%ARIZONA BASKETBALL ASSOCIATIO: $50k → 11%CHARLES SCHWAB CUP CHAMPIONSH: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Food Bank Network

Develop solutions to end hunger through food banking, public policy and innovation.

Food & Nutrition
2
Arizona Healthiest State Foundation
—
3
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
4
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
5
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
6
Arizona Next Level Basketball Found
Recreation & Sports
7
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
8
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
9
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
10
Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce

Greater phoenix chamber of commerce (the chamber) catalyzes regional prosperity with forward-thinking public policy, intentional economic growth, and diverse, prepared talent.

—
11
Greater Phoenix Economic Council

The organization's mission is to attract and grow quality businesses and advocate for greater phoenix's competitiveness.

Community Improvement
12
Environmental Fund for Arizona Inc Dba Efaz

Efaz serves, preserves and improves az's environment by raising awareness, volunteers and finanical support through workplace giving campaigns.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Charles Schwab Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF PHOENIX: $102,203 · OtherCITY OF PHOENIXBOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $15,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBWOMEN LEADERS IN SPORTS: $60,000 · Recreation & SportsWOMEN LEADERS IN SPORTSARIZONA BASKETBALL COACHES ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsARIZONA BASKETBALL COACHES ASSOCIATION I…ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyENTERTAINME…CHARLES SCHWAB FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCHARLES SCH…United Food Bank: $10,000 · Food & NutritionUnited Food…Waste Not Inc: $10,000 · Food & NutritionWaste Not I…ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $10,000 · Food & NutritionST MARY'S F…KEEP PHOENIX BEAUTIFUL INC: $20,000 · Environment
Other$117,203Recreation & Sports$110,000Philanthropy$30,000Food & Nutrition$30,000Environment$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOMEN LEADERS IN SPORTS: $60,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetARIZONA BASKETBALL COACHES ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetKEEP PHOENIX BEAUTIFUL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Food Bank: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWaste Not Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLES SCHWAB FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Phoenix Final Four Local Organizing Committee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Phoenix Final Four Local Organizing Committee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Phoenix Final Four Local Organizing Committee?

    Find your warmest path to Phoenix Final Four Local Organizing Committee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Phoenix Final Four Local Organizing Committee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph