Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Pennsylvania Urban & Community Forestry Council

Benefit urban forestry in pennsylvania

$101k
Granted FY2021
6
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202021.

Environment$159kRecreation & Sports$10k
02FY2021 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $76,932 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $101,104 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $24,172 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $62k
$11,700
Median grant
1
States reached
$546k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF HARRISBURG$20,000
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA$19,950
ABINGTON TOWNSHIP$11,700
TRI-MUNICIPAL PARK INC$10,284
COMM FOUNDATION FOR THE ALLEGHENIES$8,198
BOROUGH OF LITITZ$6,800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ABINGTON TOWNSHIP: $12k → 7%BOROUGH OF LITITZ: $7k → 9%WILLISTOWN CONSERVATION TRUST: $6k → 10%CITY OF EASTON: $8k → 11%WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $50k → 11%CITY OF WILLIAMSPORT: $8k → 12%CHARLES BABER PRESERVATION TRUST: $8k → 12%CITY OF HARRISBURG: $20k → 12%TRI-MUNICIPAL PARK INC: $10k → 16%COMM FOUNDATION FOR THE ALLEGHENIES: $8k → 16%CITY OF PHILADELPHIA: $20k → 22%TOWNSHIP OF MOON: $5k → 11%AWBURY ARBORETUM: $8k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITY OF HARRISBURG — $20,000 · OtherCITY OF HARRISBURGCITY OF PHILADELPHIA — $19,950 · OtherCITY OF PHILADELPHIATOWNSHIP OF ABINGTON — $11,700 · OtherTOWNSHIP OF ABINGTONCHARLES BABER PRESERVATION TRUST OF POTTSVILLE PA — $7,933 · OtherCHARLES BABER PRESERVATION TRUST OF POTTSVILLE PACITY OF EASTON — $7,920 · OtherCITY OF EASTONCITY OF WILLIAMSPORT — $7,569 · OtherCITY OF WILLIAMSPORTLITITZ BOROUGH — $6,800 · OtherLITITZ BOROUGHTOWNSHIP OF MOON — $5,145 · OtherTOWNSHIP OF MOONWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY — $50,000 · EnvironmentWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCYAWBURY ARBORETUM ASSOCIATION — $8,100 · EnvironmentAWBURY ARBORETUM ASSOCIATIONWillistown Conservation Trust Inc — $5,638 · EnvironmentWillistown Conservation Trust IncTRI-MUNICIPAL PARK INC — $10,284 · Recreation & SportsCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER JOHNSTOWN — $8,198 · Philanthropy
Other$87,017Environment$63,738Recreation & Sports$10,284Philanthropy$8,198

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRI-MUNICIPAL PARK INC — $10,284 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER JOHNSTOWN — $8,198 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAWBURY ARBORETUM ASSOCIATION — $8,100 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWillistown Conservation Trust Inc — $5,638 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pennsylvania Urban & Community Forestry Council funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pennsylvania Urban & Community Forestry Council?

    Find your warmest path to Pennsylvania Urban & Community Forestry Council through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph