Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Pennsylvania · Public charity

Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (PSPCA) protects animals from cruelty and abuse, rescues and rehabilitates neglected, abandoned and unwanted animals, and promotes animal welfare throughout Pennsylvania. Operating under a "No-Kill" philosophy, we provide medical care, spaying/neutering, and placement…

$1.1M
Granted FY2021
3
Grants FY2021
2
Organizations funded FY2021
0%
First-time grantees FY2021
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

75% of Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals’s FY2021 grant dollars went to First Community Foundation Partnership Of Pennsylvania, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’17
2
’18
2
’19
3
’20
2
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2021
$155,000
Largest grant, FY2021
$850,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 3
FY2017 to FY2021
States reached, FY2021
1
Total assets, FY2021
$33M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2021, 0% of the organizations Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20212$280k0%
FY20203$433k33%
FY20192$90k0%
FY20182$100k0%
FY20172$207kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Animals$2.0M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2021, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Potter County Animal Asst Project Potter County Animal Asst Project$531,500597%
Main Line Animal Rescue Inc$323,350122%
Teachers Pet Rescue$255,000570%

Compare Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals with peer funders

About Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

How much does Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals give?
Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals reported 3 grants totaling $1,130,000 in its FY2021 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 3 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2021.
What does Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2021, its largest causes are Animals (100%).
Who are Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2021: Potter County Animal Asst Project Potter County Animal Asst Project ($532k), Main Line Animal Rescue Inc ($323k), Teachers Pet Rescue ($255k).
Does Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals fund new organizations?
In FY2021, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals based?
Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home