Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Pennsylvania Breast Cancer Coalition

The pa breast cancer coalition represents, supports, and serves breast cancer survivors and their families in pa through educational programming, legislative advocacy, and breast cancer research grants.

$433k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$131k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$1.9M
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $84k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $349k
$92,293
Median grant
2
States reached
$8.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$131,262
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY$125,545
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$92,293
DREXEL UNIVERSITY$44,526
THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER$39,224
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 63% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%GEISINGER CLINIC: $47k → 10%THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $106k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $83k → 16%THE RESEARCH INSITUTE OF FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER: $48k → 22%THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $74k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $52k → 16%THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER: $39k → 22%THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $71k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $39k → 16%THE RESEARCH INSTITUE OF FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER: $39k → 22%THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $49k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 16%THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER: $32k → 22%THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $131k → 11%THE RESEARCH INSITUTE OF FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER: $30k → 22%THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $48k → 11%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $100k → 22%THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $65k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $92k → 22%THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $46k → 11%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $81k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $60k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $57k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $49k → 22%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $45k → 22%THE WISTAR INSTITUTE: $39k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $39k → 22%THE WISTAR INSTITUTE: $30k → 22%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $25k → 22%THE WISTAR INSTITUTE: $20k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $16k → 22%THE WISTAR INSTITUTE: $11k → 22%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $24k → 22%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $18k → 22%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $8k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 7 repeat orgs$172k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

$1.4M
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+18%

Still filing today

86%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $591k · revenue +44%
  • DU
    DREXEL UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2024 · $250k · revenue +10%
  • TI
    The Institute For Cancer Research
    3× · 2017–2022 · $117k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • GC
    GEISINGER CLINIC
    one grant, 2020 · $47k · revenue +18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philadelphia University

The organization is an affiliate within thomas jefferson university/jefferson health; a comprehensive professional university and tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system ("system"), with a tripartite mission of education, research…

Education
2
Temple University Hospital Inc

See Schedule OOur mission is to support Temple University and its Health Sciences Center academic programs by providing the clinical environment and service to support the highest quality teaching and training programs for health care…

Health
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

6
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

7
Upmc

Support of subsidiary tax-exempt healthcare, education and research organizations (see schedule o)

Health
8
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
9
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
10
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
11
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
12
Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals Inc

Thomas jefferson university hospitals, inc. ("tjuh") is dedicated to improving the health of the communities we serve. we are committed to: 1) setting the standard for excellence in the delivery of patient care, patient safety and the…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fox Chase Cancer Center Medical GroupIn and the most unlike its peers is Drexel University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $591,189 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $314,097 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIADREXEL UNIVERSITY — $249,778 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITYTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $125,545 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher EducationTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · EducationThe Institute For Cancer Research — $116,545 · HealthThe Institute For Ca…THE WISTAR INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY AND BIOLOGY — $100,000 · HealthTHE WISTAR INSTITUTE…Fox Chase Cancer Center Medical GroupIn — $70,998 · HealthFox Chase Cancer Cen…GEISINGER CLINIC — $46,779 · HealthGEISINGER CLINICPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY — $186,713 · OtherPENNSYLVANI…
Education$1,330,609Health$334,322Other$186,713

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $591,189 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $314,097 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $249,778 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $125,545 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Institute For Cancer Research — $116,545 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WISTAR INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY AND BIOLOGY — $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFox Chase Cancer Center Medical GroupIn — $70,998 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGEISINGER CLINIC — $46,779 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pennsylvania Breast Cancer Coalition funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph