Loading…
· Public charity
PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF NON-PROFIT
The provision of education and training programs, and the support and promotion of the operations and activities of leadingage pa.
$112k
Granted FY2024
1
Grants
1
Communities
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Community Improvement$617kHealth$125kHuman Services$12kHousing & Shelter$11kOther$31k
02FY2024 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
- BAPTIST SENIOR FAMILTY$25,000
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Bridgewater Home Inc
Assisted Living and Nursing Care
Human Services
2
Garden Path Elder Living Inc
Garden Path Elder Living operates a residential care home for elders that provide assistance with daily living and nursing oversight.
Human Services
3
Lutheran Home At Moorestown
A faith-based skilled nursing and assisted living care facility for elderly residents.
—
4
Christian Care Retirement Apartments
Providing quality middle-market residential living for seniors.
—
5
Bridgewater Village Inc
Retirement housing
Housing & Shelter
6
Lutheran Brethren Retirement Services
Nursing home and apartment rental for the elderly and disabled.
—
7
Christian Care Surprise Inc
Providing quality middle market residential and assisted living for seniors
Housing & Shelter
8
Bridgewater HealthCare Inc
Management services for related 501(c)(3) organizations.
Health
9
Portage Trail Care Center Inc
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.
Health
10
Leadingage New York Inc
Leadingage new york represents not-for-profit, mission-driven and public continuing care providers, including nursing homes, senior housing, adult care facilities, continuing care retirement communities, assisted living and community…
Civil Rights
11
National Church Residences Lincoln Lodge
Originating from a Christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for Seniors.
—
12
Lutheran Nursing Home
N/a
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Living Branches and the most unlike its peers is Wrc Senior Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Community Improvement$616,685Health$125,000Other$31,000Human Services$12,000Housing & Shelter$11,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LEADINGAGE PA - EDUCATION GRANT ↗
- Who funds BAPTIST SENIOR FAMILY ↗
- Who funds LECOM SENIOR LIVING ↗
- Who funds WRC SENIOR SERVICES ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SENIORLIFE ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN SENIORCARE ↗
- Who funds LIVING BRANCHES ↗
- Who funds BRADFORD ECUMENICAL HOME INC ↗
- Who funds BRETHREN VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds LEADINGAGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF NON-PROFIT funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: LEADINGAGE PA - EDUCATION GRANT.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~4 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 812276039 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on LEADINGAGE PA - EDUCATION GRANT, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 13% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Pennsylvania Association of Non-Profit?
Find your warmest path to Pennsylvania Association of Non-Profit through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines