Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Paton Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$39k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What you fund
0172% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Education$49kHousing & Shelter$39kAnimals$23kCommunity Improvement$15kInternational$5kFood & Nutrition$4kHuman Services$1kReligion$905Other$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
$6,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$144k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$23,081
TFT FOUNDATION$6,500
VARIOUS$5,603
Individual grant recipient$3,838
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%REACHING HIGHER: $250 → 5%REACHING HIGHER: $250 → 5%REACHING HIGHER: $250 → 5%MEALS ON WHEELS: $2k → 5%MEALS ON WHEELS: $1k → 5%MEALS ON WHEELS: $1k → 5%ROCKWALL COUNTY HELPING HANDS: $250 → 5%MEALS ON WHEELS: $105 → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
NJ
CA
MO
NC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$175k · 16 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
4

Total granted

$175k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+97%

Still filing today

38%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS
    4× · 2019–2022 · $4k · revenue +23%
  • RH
    REACHING HIGHER INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $750 · revenue +112%
  • COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $475 · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • RC
    ROCKWALL COUNTY HELPING HANDS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $250 · revenue +97%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $200

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Texas Food Bank Inc

To increase food access in Central Texas by providing nutritious food, leading hunger and poverty advocacy efforts, and transforming lives through programs, education, and innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
2
Relieve Humanity International Inc

Relieve poverty

International
3
Train the Nations
Religion
4
Impact in the World Trough Healthcare Inc

no

International
5
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
6
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
7
Feed the Children Inc

We are a global movement working to end child hunger in the u.s. and around the world. together with communities, we provide food, essentials, and opportunities so every child can survive and thrive.

International
8
Feeding Hungry Children International

Provide food, shelter, and medical assistance for children around the world.

9
Helping Hands International
10
His Healing Hands

The organization provides free short-term medical care clinics in international areas of need and administers medical and dental care clinics for individuals in need without regard for their ability to pay.

Health
11
Heights and Minds Foundation

Heights and Minds thrives to give children the best start in life by preventing malnutrition and promotiong child development. We work through establishing MindUps in low income countries.

Human Services
12
Childfund International Usa

Childfund's mission is to help deprived, excluded and vulnerable children have the capacity to become young adults, parents and leaders who bring lasting and positive change to their communities, and to promote societies whose individuals…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children International and the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $49,378 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTFT FOUNDATION — $31,000 · OtherTFT FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $16,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $15,130 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMAURILIO — $10,523 · OtherMAURILIOVARIOUS — $10,156 · OtherVARIOUSSTEPHEN — $9,595 · OtherSTEPHENIndividual grant recipient — $6,174 · Other+6 more — $7,195 · OtherTFT FOUNDATION — $15,100 · Community ImprovementTFT FOUND…Children International — $4,737 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $475 · InternationalMEALS ON WHEELS — $4,105 · Human ServicesREACHING HIGHER INC — $750 · Human ServicesROCKWALL COUNTY HELPING HANDS INC — $250 · Human Services
Other$155,951Community Improvement$15,100International$5,212Human Services$5,105

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTFT FOUNDATION — $15,100 over 2y, 57% of budgetChildren International — $4,737 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS — $4,105 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetREACHING HIGHER INC — $750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $475 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROCKWALL COUNTY HELPING HANDS INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TFT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Children International
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS
  • Who funds REACHING HIGHER INC
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
  • Who funds ROCKWALL COUNTY HELPING HANDS INC
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Paton Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Paton Family Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Paton Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph