Skip to content

California · Public charity

Paso Robles Wine Country Alliance

The primary purpose of the prwca is to improve the business conditions of the grape growing and wine producing industry in the paso robles viticultural area located in san luis obispo county, california.

$33k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
4
Itemized grants FY2024
3
Organizations funded FY2023
67%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$30k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 4
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$611k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 67% of the organizations Paso Robles Wine Country Alliance funded were first-time grantees, receiving 78% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Community ImprovementEducationPublic BenefitHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving4$30k0%
FY20233$23k67%
FY20224$51k50%
FY20212$10k50%
FY20203$15k33%
FY20193$15k67%
FY20183$15k67%
FY20171$5kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$51kFood & Nutrition$40kHealth$20kCommunity Improvement$15kEducation$13kPhilanthropy$10kPublic Benefit$10kEnvironment$5k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
American Vineyard Foundation$40,00080%
Wine Communications Group Inc$28,2691n/a
World of Wine Events LLC$22,5002n/a
Hospice Du Rhone$15,00031%
Fast Forward Ventures LLC$15,0002n/a
Roots Fund Inc$13,00011%
Dream Big Darling$10,00024%
Estrella-El Pomar-Creston Water District$5,0001n/a
Cancer Support Community - California Central Coast$5,00012%
Must$5,00010%
Show all 11 grantees
All grantees of Paso Robles Wine Country Alliance by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
American Vineyard Foundation$40,00080%
Wine Communications Group Inc$28,2691n/a
World of Wine Events LLC$22,5002n/a
Hospice Du Rhone$15,00031%
Fast Forward Ventures LLC$15,0002n/a
Roots Fund Inc$13,00011%
Dream Big Darling$10,00024%
Estrella-El Pomar-Creston Water District$5,0001n/a
Cancer Support Community - California Central Coast$5,00012%
Must$5,00010%
Rossi Foundation$5,00014%

Compare Paso Robles Wine Country Alliance with peer funders

About Paso Robles Wine Country Alliance

How much does Paso Robles Wine Country Alliance give?
Paso Robles Wine Country Alliance reported 4 itemized grants totaling $30,000, out of $33,285 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 4 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Paso Robles Wine Country Alliance fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (31%), Food & Nutrition (24%), Health (12%).
Who are Paso Robles Wine Country Alliance's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: American Vineyard Foundation ($40k), Wine Communications Group Inc ($28k), World of Wine Events LLC ($23k).
Does Paso Robles Wine Country Alliance fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 67% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Paso Robles Wine Country Alliance based?
Paso Robles Wine Country Alliance is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Paso Robles Wine Country Alliance’s filings →

More from the funding graph