Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

South Carolina · Public charity

Partners for Active Living

Mission statement: PARTNERS FOR ACTIVE LIVING transforms spartanburg county into a vibrant, healthy, connected community where we live and grow. Form 990, part iii, line 1, description of organization mission: PARTNERS FOR ACTIVE LIVING frames our work in three themes, which all point to healthy lifestyles through physical activity and…

$25k
Granted FY2017
1
Grants FY2017
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Partners for Active Living’s FY2017 grant dollars went to Spartanburg County Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2017 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Median grant, FY2017
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2017
$25,000
States reached, FY2017
1
Total assets, FY2017
$1.7M

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2017.

SPARTANBURG COUNTY FOUNDATION$25,000

Compare Partners for Active Living with peer funders

About Partners for Active Living

How much does Partners for Active Living give?
Partners for Active Living reported 1 grants totaling $25,000 in its FY2017 IRS filing.
What does Partners for Active Living fund?
By grant dollars, its largest causes are Philanthropy (100%).
Where is Partners for Active Living based?
Partners for Active Living is based in SC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2017, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Partners for Active Living’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home