· Private foundation
Park Charitable Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $102k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $345k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| American Friends of Sfath Emeth Yeshiva Inc | $205,000 |
| Friends of Mosdot Goor | $90,000 |
| Pledger | $50,000 |
| Cong Knesset Simcha | $40,000 |
| Yeshiva Ktana | $27,000 |
| Yeshiva Yagdil Torah | $23,000 |
| Kollel Bais Yisroel | $11,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Bnos Perel | $5,000 |
| Bais Yaakov D'Chassidei Gur | $3,500 |
| Yeshiva Chasan Sofer | $2,200 |
| AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY | $1,200 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,100 |
| BAIS YAAKOV OF BORO PARK | $1,000 |
| Lchaim Charity | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +159% since the first grant, against +142% for those funded once.
29 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $117k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH EMETH YESHIVA8× · 2017–2024 · $360k · revenue +88%
- ZAZECHER AVROHOM INC5× · 2017–2021 · $23k · revenue +282%
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BET SHEMESH2× · 2017–2021 · $16k · revenue +105%
Funded once
- KIKHAL ICHUD CHASIDIMone grant, 2022 · $250k
- TSTHE SOLOMON WERDIGER FAMILY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $100k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $30k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Furtherance of jewish education
To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs
Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide educational and social improvement for the children of kiryat arba, israel.
Education and religious activities and research
To provide grants to religious schools providing higher education
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
To promote, assist, and sponsor the spreading of Jewish religious education in Israel. The organization will also organize inspirational gatherings in the USA to enhance the participants' Torah knowledge.
To support jewish religious education
We support religious organizations in the us and israel by providing grants.
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Westlawn Foundation · Friends of Mosdot Goor · Zecher Avrohom Inc · Eastlawn Foundation · Chaim Maleh Foundation · The Tzedakah Foundation · Alternative Energy Foundation · Birchas Mordechai Charitable Foundation · Doovin Trust · The United Elenar Foundation · Yislawn Fund
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Park Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Park Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Park Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Park Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Park’s filings →