Skip to content
Parentchild Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Parentchild Inc

Our mission is to ensure that all children regardless of their race, socio-economic status, or zip code have equal possibilities from the start.

$3.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$961k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$6.3MHuman Services$6.1MEducation$4.6MYouth Development$368kPublic Benefit$173kCrime & Legal$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $301k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $677k
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.0M
$31,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$9.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT CORPORATION$961,169
MASA-MEXED INC$411,000
FIRST 5 SANTA CLARA COUNTY$350,000
NEW SONG COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER$272,765
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY$175,000
ALLIANCE CENTER FOR EDUCATION$135,597
THE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC$113,650
NASSAU BOCES EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC$75,000
RISING GROUND INC$71,765
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF BALTIMORE MD$56,414
BRIGHTSIDE UP$50,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ONONDAGA NY$39,812
FAMILIES FIRST IN CABARRUS COUNTY$37,500
FAMILY NURTURING CENTER OF FLORIDA INC$31,000
PEABODY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SELF HELP INC: $20k → 7%COALITION FOR CHILDREN: $21k → 8%Family Services Ass of NE PA: $30k → 15%Family Service League: $107k → 7%RISING GROUND: $70k → 9%BRIGHTSIDE UP: $50k → 14%FAMILIES FIRST IN CABARRUS COUNTY: $38k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF BALTIMORE MD: $56k → 11%COALITION FOR CHILDREN: $14k → 8%RISING GROUND: $13k → 9%Catholic Charities Onondaga: $65k → 14%BRIGHTSIDE UP: $50k → 14%SCO Family of Services: $172k → 20%Leake and Watts: $50k → 28%SCO Family of Services: $86k → 20%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $204k → 8%SCO Family of Services: $61k → 20%RISING GROUND INC: $83k → 20%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $175k → 8%RISING GROUND INC: $73k → 20%RISING GROUND INC: $72k → 20%Family Nurturing Center of MA: $64k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $88k → 8%RISING GROUND INC: $53k → 20%Family Nurturing Center of MA: $48k → 16%Family Nurturing Center of MA: $48k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $80k → 8%CITY OF BOSTON: $48k → 16%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WORCESTER: $16k → 11%FAMILY NURTURING CENTER OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $48k → 16%CITY OF MARLBOROUGH: $16k → 11%Family Nurturing Center of MA: $48k → 16%MARLBOROUGH PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $16k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
PA
CA
MO
MD
NC
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 37 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
31

Total granted

$16M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+27%

Still filing today

43%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $494k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    Public Health Management Corporation
    8× · 2017–2025 · $6.3M · revenue +391%
  • MI
    MASA-MEXED INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +205% · 29% of their budget
  • TC
    THE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $141k
  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $107k · revenue +50%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ONONDAGA NY
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Committee for Hispanic Children and Families Inc

The organization is dedicated to combining education and advocacy to expand opportunities for children and families in order to strengthen the voice of the latino community based on the belief that the most effective way to support latino…

Human Services
2
Children's Friend and Service

The mission of children's friend and service (the organization) is to be the innovative leader in improving the well-being and healthy development of rhode island's most vulnerable young children. they accomplish this by providing flexible…

Human Services
3
The Friends of Crown Heights Educational Centers Inc

To provide a safe, affordable and comprehensive program of high-quality early childhood education, parental and family support, as well as academic enrichment and recreational programs.

Human Services
4
Family Services of Westchester Inc

Family services of westchester offers a broad range of social and mental health services to strengthen and support families, children and individuals at every stages of the life cycle from infancy to adulthood.

—
5
Family Services Inc

To strengthen the well-being and development of families and individuals through professional human services programs, including therapy, counseling, education, special assistance, and advocacy.

Human Services
6
Berkshire County Head Start Child Development Program Inc

To enhance opportunities for success by inspiring each child's love of learning, partnering with families, advocating for equity, and fostering a connection to community.

Education
7
Children's Aid College Prep Charter School

Prepare elementary & middle school students for success in high school, college & life.

Education
8
Northside Center for Child Development Inc

To foster the healthy development of children and families and seek to empower them to respond constructively to negative societal factors including racism and its related consequences. through comprehensive, high quality mental health and…

Education
9
Community Services for Children Inc

Csc prepares young children and their families to succeed in learning and life through innovative, comprehensive, leading edge services.

Education
10
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
11
Westchester Community Opportunity Program Inc

To mobilize and efficiently manage resources through partnerships and collaborations to help the low-income and at-risk populations in the hudson valley region to achieve greater self-sufficiency.

Community Improvement
12
Northside Center for Child Development Day School

Northside center for child development day school (the "school") operates a comprehensive treatment center dedicated to meeting the social, emotional and educational needs of children and their families, principally through the operation…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Child Center of Ny Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fall River Educators' Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/37
Grantees still filing
21/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Public Health Management Corporation: $6,312,179 · HealthPublic Health Management Corporation+2 more: $33,350 · HealthFIRST 5 SANTA CLARA: $1,871,179 · OtherFIRST 5 SANTA CLARATHE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC: $1,087,175 · OtherTHE CHILD CENTER OF NY INCNEW SONG COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER INC: $367,765 · OtherNEW SONG COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER INC+48 more: $2,938,903 · Other+48 moreMASA-MEXED INC: $1,614,450 · EducationMASA-MEXED INCCharlotte Bilingual Learning Center: $441,720 · EducationCharlotte Bilingu…Brockton Educational Foundation Inc: $257,000 · EducationBrockton Educatio…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $136,564 · EducationALLIANCE CENTER FOR EDUCATION INC: $135,597 · Education+6 more: $245,812 · Education+6 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $546,657 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHAR…RISING GROUND INC: $412,555 · Human ServicesRISING GROUND…SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES: $319,000 · Human ServicesSCO FAMILY OF…FAMILY NURTURING CENTER OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $304,100 · Human ServicesFAMILY NURTUR…FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC: $107,432 · Human ServicesBRIGHTSIDE UP INC: $100,000 · Human Services+7 more: $292,325 · Human Services+7 moreCORE PROGRAMS INC: $357,821 · Housing & ShelterBATON ROUGE EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION COLLABORATIVE INC: $91,300 · Community ImprovementNEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · Recreation & SportsFAMILY NURTURING CENTER OF FLORIDA INC: $31,000 · Crime & Legal
Health$6,345,529Other$6,265,022Education$2,831,143Human Services$2,082,069Housing & Shelter$357,821Community Improvement$91,300Recreation & Sports$75,000Crime & Legal$31,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPublic Health Management Corporation: $6,312,179 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetMASA-MEXED INC: $1,614,450 over 7y, 29% of budgetTHE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC: $1,087,175 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $546,657 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCharlotte Bilingual Learning Center: $441,720 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetRISING GROUND INC: $412,555 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNEW SONG COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER INC: $367,765 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetCORE PROGRAMS INC: $357,821 over 4y, 8.8% of budgetSCO FAMILY OF SERVICES: $319,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY NURTURING CENTER OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $304,100 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetBrockton Educational Foundation Inc: $257,000 over 3y, 38% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $136,564 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE CENTER FOR EDUCATION INC: $135,597 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC: $107,432 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBRIGHTSIDE UP INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPEOPLE ACTING IN COMMUNITY ENDEAVORS INC: $94,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBATON ROUGE EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION COLLABORATIVE INC: $91,300 over 1y, 19% of budgetNASSAU BOCES EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 73% of budgetNEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SYRACUSE NY: $65,411 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $56,414 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA of Central Massachusetts (2909): $48,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $39,812 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD CARE OF THE BERKSHIRES INC: $39,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFamilies First in Cabarrus County: $37,500 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetCOALITION FOR CHILDREN: $35,000 over 2y, 83% of budgetFAMILY NURTURING CENTER OF FLORIDA INC: $31,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $30,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWORCESTER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetFALL RIVER EDUCATORS' ASSOCIATION INC: $21,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSELF HELP INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNSET PARK HEALTH COUNCIL INC: $13,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetResearch Foundation of the City University of New York: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRIUMPH INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Public Health Management Corporation ↗
  • Who funds MASA-MEXED INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Charlotte Bilingual Learning Center ↗
  • Who funds RISING GROUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW SONG COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CORE PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY NURTURING CENTER OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Brockton Educational Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE CENTER FOR EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTSIDE UP INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE ACTING IN COMMUNITY ENDEAVORS INC ↗
  • Who funds TUSCARORA INTERMEDIATE UNIT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BATON ROUGE EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds NASSAU BOCES EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SYRACUSE NY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way Of Massach…Health Resources in A…Center for Technology…Combined Jewish Phila…Project Lead the Way …Project Bread-The Wal…Mother Cabrini Health…Project Lead the Way …Eastern Bank Foundati…Metro North Regional …National Energy Educa…Eos Foundation
United Way Of Massachusetts Bay IncMA22.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Health Resources in Action Inc · Center for Technology and Civic Life · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · Project Bread-The Walk for Hunger Inc · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Metro North Regional Employment Board · National Energy Education Development Project Inc · Eos Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Parentchild Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Parentchild Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 59%
  • Triumph Inc: 89% of income from government
  • New North Citizens Council Inc: 75% of income from government
  • Child Care of the Berkshires Inc: 59% of income from government
  • Self Help Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Associated Catholic Charities Inc: 10% of income from government
  • People Acting in Community Endeavors Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Parentchild’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home