Skip to content
Panhandle Regional Advisory Council Trauma Service Area A at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Panhandle Regional Advisory Council Trauma Service Area A

Trauma prevention education & awareness.

$562k
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$3.2MPhilanthropy$221kHealth$50k
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 26 grants below total $320,743, the rows itemized in this filing. The $562,060 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $241,317 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $243k
$13,271
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMRAMARILLO MEDICAL SERVICES$37,893
Individual grant recipient$22,305
Individual grant recipient$21,302
Individual grant recipient$17,815
Individual grant recipient$14,265
MOORE CO HOSPITAL DISTRICT EMS$13,709
ASSOCIATED AMBULANCE AUTHORITY$13,656
Individual grant recipient$13,613
Individual grant recipient$13,585
Individual grant recipient$13,460
WELLINGTON EMS$13,411
Individual grant recipient$13,399
Individual grant recipient$13,271
Individual grant recipient$10,979
CHILDRESS REGIONAL MEDICAL CTR EMS$10,545
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 19%. 11% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 19%HARTLEY EMS: $36k → 9%MIAMI VOLUNTEER EMS: $23k → 10%CLAUDE EMS: $23k → 10%TEXLINE EMS: $19k → 11%HEMPHILL COUNTY EMS: $37k → 11%MOORE CO HOSPITAL DISTRICT EMS: $24k → 12%PERRYTON EMS: $18k → 12%STINNETT EMS: $25k → 12%STRATFORD EMS: $23k → 12%CITY OF SEMINOLE-SEMINOLE EMS: $27k → 15%COVENANT HOSPITAL LEVELLAND: $24k → 15%SCURRY COUNTY EMS: $54k → 15%LYNN COUNTY EMS: $32k → 16%BAILEY COUNTY EMS: $31k → 16%EMERGENCY SERVICES FOUNDATION OF TXPAMPA EMS: $43k → 17%WELLINGTON EMS: $23k → 17%HEREFORD EMS: $54k → 17%WEST CARLISLE FIREEMS: $20k → 17%CITY OF LITTLEFIELD EMS: $28k → 18%ASSOCIATED AMBULANCE AUTHORITY: $23k → 18%CHILDRESS REGIONAL MEDICAL CTR EMS: $18k → 20%PLAINVIEW FIRE DEPTEMS: $25k → 22%TURKEY EMS: $26k → 23%HARTLEY EMS: $23k → 9%HEMPHILLGRAY COUNTY EMS: $32k → 11%FRIONA EMS: $22k → 14%HEREFORD EMS: $38k → 17%STAR EMERGENCY GROUP PLLC: $30k → 17%HARTLEY EMS: $21k → 9%HEMPHILL COUNTY EMS: $23k → 11%HEREFORD EMS: $22k → 17%COVENANT AMBULANCE SERVICE: $35k → 17%HARTLEY EMS: $20k → 9%HEMPHILL COUNTY EMS: $18k → 11%HEREFORD EMS: $21k → 17%LUBBOCK CO HOSP DIST DBA UMC EMS: $165k → 17%GRAY CO EMS: $17k → 11%BOOKER EMS: $59k → 14%PANHANDLE EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN PLLC: $73k → 20%LIFESTAR: $25k → 20%BSA HOSPITAL LLCBSA HEALTH SYSTEM EMS: $20k → 9%DALLAM-HARTLEY COUNTY HOSP DIST: $72k → 11%BORGER EMS: $55k → 12%DALHART EMS: $19k → 11%AMARILLO MEDICAL SERVICES: $43k → 9%AMRAMARILLO MEDICAL SERVICES: $38k → 9%AMARILLO MEDICAL SERVICES: $26k → 9%AMARILLO MEDICAL SERVICES: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 45 repeat orgs$744k to everyone else

45 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
21

Total granted

$2.7M
$700k

Still filing today

9%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    8× · 2017–2024 · $199k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    8× · 2017–2024 · $146k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    6× · 2017–2024 · $142k

Funded once

  • LC
    LUBBOCK CO HOSP DIST DBA UMC EMS
    one grant, 2018 · $165k
  • PE
    PANHANDLE EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN PLLC
    one grant, 2018 · $73k
  • DC
    DALLAM-HARTLEY COUNTY HOSP DIST
    one grant, 2018 · $72k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $199,282 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLUBBOCK CO HOSP DIST DBA UMC EMS: $165,129 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $145,934 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $141,569 · OtherAMARILLO MEDICAL SERVICES: $128,169 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $108,752 · Other+58 more: $2,318,775 · Other+58 moreWELLINGTON EMS INC: $86,988 · HealthEMERGENCY SERVICES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $73,616 · HealthHALL COUNTY EMS INC: $38,577 · Public Safety & DisasterWHITE DEER VOLUNTEER EMS: $15,054 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$3,207,610Health$160,604Public Safety & Disaster$53,631

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWELLINGTON EMS INC: $86,988 over 7y, 6.2% of budgetEMERGENCY SERVICES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $73,616 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetHALL COUNTY EMS INC: $38,577 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetWHITE DEER VOLUNTEER EMS: $15,054 over 2y, 19% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WELLINGTON EMS INC ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY SERVICES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds HALL COUNTY EMS INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Panhandle Regional Advisory Council Trauma Service Area A funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Panhandle Regional Advisory Council Trauma Service Area A. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Panhandle Regional Advisory Council Trauma Service Area A’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home