Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Pacific Retirement Services Inc

Pacific retirement services' mission is to empower people to lead meaningful lives as they age.

$10k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$14MEmployment$19k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$72M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEADING AGE CALIFORNIA$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNIVERSITY RETIREMENT COMMUNITY AT DAVIS: $124k → 16%THE CUMBERLAND REST INC: $150k → 11%HOLLADAY PARK PLAZA: $91k → 12%ROGUE VALLEY MANOR: $230k → 13%CASCADE MANOR INC: $59k → 15%UNIVERSITY RETIREMENT COMMUNITY AT DAVIS: $121k → 16%THE CUMBERLAND REST INC: $123k → 11%HOLLADAY PARK PLAZA: $87k → 12%CASCADE MANOR INC: $47k → 15%UNIVERSITY RETIREMENT COMMUNITY AT DAVIS: $60k → 16%THE CUMBERLAND REST INC: $57k → 11%HOLLADAY PARK PLAZA: $51k → 12%CASCADE MANOR INC: $29k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$14M · 7 repeat orgs$351k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$14M
$351k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+12%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MIRABELLA AT ASU INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $13M · revenue +19% · 100% of their budget
  • TC
    THE CUMBERLAND REST INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $330k · revenue +87%
  • MA
    MIRABELLA AT SOUTH WATERFRONT
    4× · 2017–2020 · $317k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • RV
    ROGUE VALLEY MANOR
    2× · 2019–2020 · $230k · revenue +12%
  • M
    MIRABELLA
    2× · 2019–2020 · $121k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pacific Retirement Services Inc

Pacific retirement services' mission is to empower people to lead meaningful lives as they age.

Human Services
2
La Vida Llena

La vida llena will provide residents an enhanced personalized lifestyle and is a community that enhances the life of seniors in a safe premier living environment that fosters excellent services by a caring staff.

3
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

4
Meadow Lake Llc

Creating communities celebrating the lives of seniors. lifespace recognizes that its mission can only be fulfilled through the dedicated efforts of its employees, therefore, included in our mission is the ability to provide disaster relief…

Human Services
5
Christian Care Mesa Ii Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
6
Bay Area Senior Services Inc

To provide care and housing for the elderly.

Housing & Shelter
7
Kendal At Ithaca Inc

Our mission is to provide a mutually supportive environment for residents and staff, and to contribute to the greater ithaca community.

Human Services
8
Carmel Residence Inc

Carmel residence, inc., is part of a family of healthcare and residential service organizations committed to providing quality care and life enriching opportunities to the aging and those in need of a caring, christian environment.

Housing & Shelter
9
Christian Care Mesa Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Human Services
10
Eastside Retirement Association

Emerald heights is a not-for-profit non-denominational life plan retirement community providing a continuum of living accommodations, supportive services, and health care for residents 55 years of age and older. as a life plan retirement…

Human Services
11
Christian Care Surprise Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
12
Duncaster Incorporated

Duncaster's mission is to enrich the lives of those we serve through excellence in senior living, life enhancement activities, and person-centered care.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mirabella At South Waterfront and the most unlike its peers is Leadingage California. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MIRABELLA AT ASU INC — $12,505,873 · Housing & ShelterMIRABELLA AT ASU INC+2 more — $438,460 · Housing & ShelterTHE CUMBERLAND REST INC — $330,421 · Human ServicesTHE CUMBE…UNIVERSITY RETIREMENT COMMUNITY AT DAVIS — $306,059 · Human ServicesUNIVERSIT…ROGUE VALLEY MANOR — $229,704 · Human ServicesROGUE VAL…HOLLADAY PARK PLAZA — $229,316 · Human ServicesHOLLADAY …CASCADE MANOR INC — $134,574 · Human ServicesCASCADE M…LEADINGAGE CALIFORNIA — $19,000 · Employment
Housing & Shelter$12,944,333Human Services$1,230,074Employment$19,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMIRABELLA AT ASU INC — $12,505,873 over 3y, 100% of budgetTHE CUMBERLAND REST INC — $330,421 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMIRABELLA AT SOUTH WATERFRONT — $317,146 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY RETIREMENT COMMUNITY AT DAVIS — $306,059 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetROGUE VALLEY MANOR — $229,704 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHOLLADAY PARK PLAZA — $229,316 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCASCADE MANOR INC — $134,574 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMIRABELLA — $121,314 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLEADINGAGE CALIFORNIA — $19,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pacific Retirement Services Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Holladay Park Plaza0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2024

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph