Skip to content

· Public charity

Pacific Gas & Electric Company Employees Community Fund

Pacific gas and electric company employees community fund was organized primarily to provide grants to individuals and organizations for educational purposes.

$179k
Granted FY2024still arriving
82
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$372kScience & Tech$9kHousing & Shelter$2kReligion$2kCommunity Improvement$1kPublic Benefit$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 82 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 82 grants below total $136,575, the rows itemized in this filing. The $179,325 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $42,750 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$1,500
Median grant
—
States reached
$359k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Pennsylvania$6,000
Georgia Institute of Technology$4,000
Swarthmore College$4,000
University of California - Davis$4,000
UCLA$4,000
California State University - Long Beach$3,475
USC$3,000
Montana State University - Bozeman$3,000
Yale College$3,000
University of California, Davis$3,000
UCLA$3,000
University of California, Los Angeles$2,500
California Baptist University$2,000
Berkeley City College$2,000
Bay$2,000
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$262k · 24 repeat orgs$181k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 31 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
60

Total granted

$262k
$125k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of California - Los Angeles
    3× · 2022–2024 · $34k
  • UO
    University of California, Berkeley
    3× · 2022–2024 · $34k
  • UO
    University of Southern California
    3× · 2022–2024 · $27k

Funded once

  • SF
    San Francisco State University
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • S
    Standford
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • RC
    Reed College
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field
03the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2022–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2022 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 115 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of California - Los Angeles: $34,250 · OtherUniversity of California - Los AngelesUniversity of California, Berkeley: $34,100 · OtherUniversity of California, BerkeleyUniversity of Southern California: $26,800 · OtherUniversity of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of California - Davis: $23,100 · OtherUCLA: $22,000 · Other+110 more: $302,350 · Other+110 more
Other$442,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pacific Gas & Electric Company Employees Community Fund?

Find your warmest path to Pacific Gas & Electric Company Employees Community Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 115 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pacific Gas & Electric Company Employees’ filings →

More from the funding graph