Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Osteo Science Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$221k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0167% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$1.8MEducation$1.3MSocial Science$220kScience & Tech$33kArts & Culture$12kReligion$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$4,532
Median grant
9
States reached
$506k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON$49,819
THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$45,130
STATE OF MARYLAND UNIV OF MARYLAND$25,000
Individual grant recipient$5,675
OREGON HEALTH SCIENCE UNIV$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,867
Individual grant recipient$4,635
Individual grant recipient$4,532
DR TAREK N METWALLY$4,529
Individual grant recipient$4,427
Individual grant recipient$4,260
Individual grant recipient$3,633
Individual grant recipient$3,556
Individual grant recipient$2,860
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 85% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $50k → 11%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $50k → 22%REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $50k → 14%THE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH: $21k → 6%TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW: $50k → 17%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT H: $100k → 16%TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER: $50k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA - FINANCIAL AID SERVICES: $99k → 13%FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY: $25k → 11%NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC: $50k → 13%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF OREGON: $50k → 15%EMORY UNIVERSITY - SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $50k → 14%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $100k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON-BOTHELL CAMPUS: $50k → 9%ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOI: $35k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $50k → 18%LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 22%STATE OF MARYLAND UNIV OF MARYLAND: $25k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND EASTERN SHOR: $50k → 22%UNIV OF LOUISVILLE RESEARCH FOUNDAT: $20k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $40k → 11%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $50k → 22%REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY Leonard N Stern School of Bu: $25k → 17%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT H: $50k → 16%THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA: $50k → 13%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $50k → 14%EMORY UNIVERSITY - SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON-BOTHELL CAMPUS: $50k → 9%ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 22%STATE OF MARYLAND UNIV OF MARLAND: $25k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION: $50k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $10k → 11%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $50k → 22%REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $50k → 14%ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $50k → 14%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $25k → 14%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $25k → 22%INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIA: $155k → 14%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $25k → 22%INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIA: $40k → 14%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $18k → 22%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $12k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
DE
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of Osteo Science Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Osteo Science Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.6% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 24 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
190

Total granted

$1.8M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+37%

Still filing today

29%
4%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $221k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    5× · 2018–2022 · $160k · revenue +40%
  • EU
    Emory University
    2× · 2018–2019 · $100k · revenue +61%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $99k · revenue +131%

Funded once

  • TO
    THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA - FINANCIAL AID SERVICES
    one grant, 2020 · $99k
  • OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $90k · revenue +37%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
2
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
5
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
6
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
7
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
8
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
9
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
10
University Foundation
11
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
12
University of Notre Dame du Lac

See Schedule O. See explanation for Form 990, Part I, Line 1 - Organization's Mission above.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Louisville Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Oregon Health & Science University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 232 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIA — $205,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $177,500 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER HOUSTON — $150,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER HOUSTONUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON-BOTHELL CAMPUS — $140,000 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA — $120,000 · OtherTHE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE MCGILL UNIVERSITY HE — $119,070 · OtherLOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER — $100,000 · OtherTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON — $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA - FINANCIAL AID SERVICES — $98,899 · Other+176 more — $1,326,535 · Other+176 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $199,998 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF …UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $160,375 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHEmory University — $100,000 · EducationEmory UniversityTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC — $99,300 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FO…OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $90,000 · EducationOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVER…Marquette University — $80,696 · EducationMarquette UniversityTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $79,498 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · EducationNova Southeastern University Inc — $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Education+2 more — $30,250 · EducationORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY FOUNDATION — $85,000 · HealthTHE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH — $21,080 · Health
Other$2,637,004Education$990,117Health$106,080

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $199,998 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $160,375 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC — $99,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $90,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY FOUNDATION — $85,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetMarquette University — $80,696 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $79,498 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNova Southeastern University Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH — $21,080 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC — $15,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $15,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetUNIV OF LOUISIANA AT LAFAYETTE FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds Emory University
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Marquette University
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Nova Southeastern University Inc
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Osteo Science Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc2% of income from government
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation1% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Osteo Science Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Osteo Science Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 232 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph