Skip to content

· Public charity

Ossining Volunteer Fire Department Fund Raising Committee Inc

To provide support for fire protection services

$100k
Granted FY2021
9
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2021.

Public Safety & Disaster$230k
02FY2021 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
$10,350
Median grant
1
States reached
$49k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Washington Hook & Ladder Co$20,305
Ossining Hose Company No 1$16,630
Holla Hose Co 5 Inc$11,655
Cataract Hose Company Inc$11,280
Ossining Steamer Company Inc$10,350
Monitor Hose Co No 4 Inc$9,230
Ossining Fire Police & Emergency$7,180
Independent Hose Co$6,930
Senate Hook & Ladder Co$6,530
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%Washington Hook & Ladder Co: $20k → 9%Ossining Hose Company No 1: $17k → 9%Ossining Hose Company No 1: $14k → 9%Ossining Hose Company No 1: $12k → 9%Holla Hose Co 5 Inc: $12k → 9%Cataract Hose Company Inc: $11k → 9%Washington Hook & Ladder Co: $11k → 9%Cataract Hose Company Inc: $11k → 9%Cataract Hose Company Inc: $10k → 9%Ossining Steamer Company Inc: $10k → 9%Ossining Steamer Company Inc: $10k → 9%Monitor Hose Co No 4 Inc: $10k → 9%Ossining Steamer Company Inc: $9k → 9%Monitor Hose Co No 4 Inc: $9k → 9%Senate Hook & Ladder Co: $9k → 9%Independent Hose Co: $8k → 9%Ossining Fire Police & Emergency: $7k → 9%Monitor Hose Co No 4 Inc: $7k → 9%Independent Hose Co: $7k → 9%Ossining Fire Police & Emergency: $7k → 9%Senate Hook & Ladder Co: $7k → 9%Holla Hose Co 5 Inc: $7k → 9%Senate Hook & Ladder Co: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$230k · 9 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
0

Total granted

$230k
$0

Still filing today

22%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    OSSINING HOSE COMPANY NO 1 INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $43k
  • CH
    CATARACT HOSE COMPANY NO 2 INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $33k
  • WH
    WASHINGTON HOOK & LADDER COMPANY OF OSSINING INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $31k

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    2/2
    Grantees still filing
    2/2
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    OSSINING HOSE COMPANY NO 1 INC: $42,505 · OtherOSSINING HOSE COMPANY NO 1 INCCATARACT HOSE COMPANY NO 2 INC: $32,655 · OtherCATARACT HOSE COMPANY NO 2 INCWASHINGTON HOOK & LADDER COMPANY OF OSSINING INC: $31,255 · OtherWASHINGTON HOOK & LADDER COMPANY OF OSSINING INCMONITOR HOSE COMPANY NO 4 INC: $25,905 · OtherMONITOR HOSE COMPANY NO 4 INCSENATE HOOK & LADDER CO NO 1 INC: $20,930 · OtherSENATE HOOK & LADDER CO NO 1 INCINDEPENDENT HOSE COMPANY 6: $14,830 · OtherINDEPENDENT HOSE COMPANY 6Ossining Fire Police & Emergency: $13,880 · OtherOssining Fire Police & EmergencyOSSINING STEAMER COMPANY INC: $29,975 · Public Safety & DisasterOSSINING STEAMER COMPAN…HOLLA HOSE CO 5 INC: $18,155 · Public Safety & DisasterHOLLA HOSE CO 5 INC
    Other$181,960Public Safety & Disaster$48,130

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOSSINING STEAMER COMPANY INC: $29,975 over 3y, 20% of budgetHOLLA HOSE CO 5 INC: $18,155 over 3y, 65% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds OSSINING STEAMER COMPANY INC ↗
    • Who funds HOLLA HOSE CO 5 INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

    Ossining Fire Department Board of Fire Commissioners IncNY22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Ossining Fire Department Board of Fire Commissioners Inc

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Ossining Volunteer Fire Department Fund Raising Committee Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ossining Volunteer Fire Department Fund Raising Committee Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Ossining Volunteer Fire Department Fund Raising Committee Inc?

      Find your warmest path to Ossining Volunteer Fire Department Fund Raising Committee Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $55k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Ossining Volunteer Fire Department Fund Raising Committee’s filings →

      More from the funding graph