Skip to content

· Public charity

Ossining Fire Department Board of Fire Commissioners Inc

to provide fire protection services

$554k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$58k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$836kHuman Services$50kArts & Culture$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $523k
$58,145
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Monitor Hose Company No 4$58,145
Cataract Hose Company Inc$58,145
Independent Hose Company No 6 of Ossining NY$58,145
Senate Hook & Ladder Company No 1 Inc$58,145
Holla Hose Co 5 Inc$58,145
Ossining Steamer Company Inc$58,145
Ossining Fire Police & Emergency Squad Inc$58,145
Washington Hook & Ladder Co of Ossining Inc$58,145
Ossining Hose Company No 1$58,145
St Peters Drum Corp$13,000
Ossining Deputy Chiefs Association$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%Ossining Hose Co No 1: $60k → 9%St Peters Drum Corp: $15k → 17%St Peters Drum Corp: $13k → 9%Independent Hose Company No 6 of Ossining NY: $58k → 9%St Peters Drum Corp: $12k → 9%Holla Hose Co 5 Inc: $58k → 9%Cataract Hose Company Inc: $58k → 9%Ossining Hose Company No 1: $58k → 9%Senate Hook & Ladder Company No 1 Inc: $58k → 9%Ossining Fire Police & Emergency Squad Inc: $58k → 9%Washington Hook & Ladder Co of Ossining Inc: $58k → 9%Ossining Steamer Company Inc: $58k → 9%Monitor Hose Company No 4: $58k → 9%Independent Hose Company No 6 of Ossining NY: $17k → 9%Washington Hook & Ladder Co of Ossining Inc: $16k → 9%Holla Hose Co 5 Inc: $14k → 9%Senate Hook & Ladder Company No 1 Inc: $12k → 9%Ossining Steamer Company Inc: $12k → 9%Ossining Deputy Chiefs Association Inc: $10k → 9%Ossining Deputy Chiefs Association: $10k → 9%Ossining Deputy Chiefs Association Inc: $10k → 9%Ossining Deputy Chiefs Associatino: $10k → 9%Ossining Deputy Chiefs Association: $10k → 9%Ossining Steamer Company Inc: $8k → 9%Independent Hose Company No 6 of Ossining NY: $8k → 9%Holla Hose Co 5 Inc: $8k → 9%Monitor Hose Company No 4 Inc: $8k → 9%Senate Hook & Ladder Co No 1 Inc: $8k → 9%Cataract Hose Company Inc: $8k → 9%Ossining Hose Company No 1 Inc: $8k → 9%Washington Hook & Ladder Company of Ossining Inc: $8k → 9%Cataract Hose Company Inc: $7k → 9%Holla Hose Co 5 Inc: $7k → 9%Monitor Hose Company No 4: $7k → 9%Washington Hook & Ladder Co of Ossining Inc: $7k → 9%Ossining Fire Police & Emergency Squad Inc: $7k → 9%Ossining Hose Company No 1: $7k → 9%Ossining Steamer Company Inc: $7k → 9%Senate Hook & Ladder Company No 1 Inc: $7k → 9%OFD Venturing Crew: $6k → 9%Cataract Hose Company Inc: $6k → 9%Holla Hose Co 5 Inc: $6k → 9%Cataract Hose Company Inc: $6k → 9%Washington Hook & Ladder Company of Ossining Inc: $6k → 9%Ossining Fire Police & Emergency Squad Inc: $6k → 9%Independent Hose Company No 6 of Ossining N Y: $6k → 9%Monitor Hose Company No 4 Inc: $6k → 9%Monitor Hose Company No 4: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$911k · 11 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$911k
$22k

Still filing today

18%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    OSSINING HOSE COMPANY NO 1 INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $139k
  • IH
    INDEPENDENT HOSE COMPANY 6
    5× · 2020–2024 · $95k
  • WH
    WASHINGTON HOOK & LADDER COMPANY OF OSSINING INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $95k

Funded once

  • SP
    St Peters Drum Corp
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
1/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OSSINING HOSE COMPANY NO 1 INC: $138,645 · OtherOSSINING HOSE COMPANY NO 1 INCINDEPENDENT HOSE COMPANY 6: $94,645 · OtherINDEPENDENT HOSE COMPANY 6WASHINGTON HOOK & LADDER COMPANY OF OSSINING INC: $94,645 · OtherWASHINGTON HOOK & LADDER COMPANY OF OSSINING INCCATARACT HOSE COMPANY NO 2 INC: $84,745 · OtherCATARACT HOSE COMPANY NO 2 INCMONITOR HOSE COMPANY NO 4 INC: $84,645 · OtherMONITOR HOSE COMPANY NO 4 INCSENATE HOOK & LADDER CO NO 1 INC: $84,645 · OtherSENATE HOOK & LADDER CO NO 1 INCOSSINING FIRE POLICE AND EMERGENCY SQUAD INC: $77,145 · OtherOSSINING FIRE POLICE AND EMERGENCY SQUAD INCOSSINING DEPUTY CHIEFS ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 · OtherOSSINING DEPUTY CHIEFS ASSOCIATION INC+3 more: $46,306 · Other+3 moreHOLLA HOSE CO 5 INC: $92,145 · Public Safety & DisasterHOLLA HOSE CO 5 INCOSSINING STEAMER COMPANY INC: $84,645 · Public Safety & DisasterOSSINING STEAMER COMP…
Other$755,421Public Safety & Disaster$176,790

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOLLA HOSE CO 5 INC: $92,145 over 5y, 76% of budgetOSSINING STEAMER COMPANY INC: $84,645 over 4y, 28% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOLLA HOSE CO 5 INC ↗
  • Who funds OSSINING STEAMER COMPANY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Ossining Volunteer Fire Department Fund Raising Committee IncNY22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ossining Volunteer Fire Department Fund Raising Committee Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ossining Fire Department Board of Fire Commissioners Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ossining Fire Department Board of Fire Commissioners Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ossining Fire Department Board of Fire Commissioners’ filings →

    More from the funding graph