Skip to content

· Private foundation

Oscar & Anna Bentley Charitable Foundation

Its FY2017 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$59k
Granted FY2017
13
Grants FY2017
8
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k12 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$4,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAZON INC A JEWISH RESPONSE TO HUNGER$12,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$6,000
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTE INC$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC$5,000
NATIONAL LAW CENTER ON HOMELESSNESS AND POVERTY$4,000
FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC$4,000
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS$4,000
HOUSTON FOOD BANK$4,000
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE$4,000
THE CAMPAGNA CENTER$3,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$3,000
CENTER ON BUDGET AND POLICY PRIORITIES$2,500
UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC$2,500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE CAMPAGNA CENTER: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CA
VA
NC
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
2
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
3
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
4
2020 Mom Policy Center for Maternal

The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. the policy center has been…

Health
5
Guttmacher Institute Inc

The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.

—
6
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
7
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
8
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
9
The Poptech Institute

Poptech's mission is to accelerate the positive impact of world-changing people, projects and ideas. founded in 1996 by bob metcalfe (inventor, ethernet) and john sculley (apple, pepsi), poptech originally provided a forum to critically…

Education
10
Convergence Center for Policy Resolution

Convergence is the leading organization bridging divides to solve critical issues. with our time-tested collaborative problem-solving methodology, we bring people together across ideological, political, & identity lines to improve the…

Education
11
Hunger Free America Inc

Hunger free america (hfa) is a nonpartisan, national nonprofit organization building the movement to enact the policies and programs needed to end domestic hunger and ensure that all americans have sufficient access to nutritious food.

—
12
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southern Poverty Law Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Campagna Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
13/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $12,000 · OtherMAZON A Jewish Response to HungerNATIONAL LAW CENTER ON HOMELESSNESS AND POVERTY: $4,000 · OtherNATIONAL LAW CENTER ON HOMELESSNESS AN…The Houston Food Bank: $4,000 · OtherThe Houston Food BankMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA…The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $5,000 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Di…THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $4,000 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIEN…BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $4,000 · Crime & LegalBRADY CENTER …SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $3,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVE…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 · HealthPLANNED P…FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $4,000 · Food & NutritionTHE CAMPAGNA CENTER INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $2,500 · EducationCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities: $2,500 · Public Benefit
Other$20,000International$15,000Crime & Legal$7,000Health$5,000Food & Nutrition$4,000Human Services$3,000Education$2,500Public Benefit$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL LAW CENTER ON HOMELESSNESS AND POVERTY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CAMPAGNA CENTER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oscar & Anna Bentley Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oscar & Anna Bentley Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Oscar & Anna Bentley Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Oscar & Anna Bentley Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Oscar & Anna Bentley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph