Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Order of the Eastern Star of Washington Grand Chapter

To promote friendship and harmony among members and to practice charity

$134k
Granted FY2026still arriving
2
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20232026.

Animals$148kHealth$97kOther$12k
02FY2026 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $58,908 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $133,905 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $74,997 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$35,016
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIGADOON SERVICE DOGS$35,016
SHRINERS CHILDREN'S SPOKANE$23,892
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 72% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $7k → 14%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH: $7k → 9%EASTERN STAR CHARITIES FD OF WA: $5k → 9%BRIGADOON SERVICE DOGS: $48k → 12%SHRINERS CHILDREN'S SPOKANE: $24k → 12%MAKE A WISH FDN OF AK & WA: $36k → 9%BRIGADOON SERVICE DOGS: $40k → 12%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH: $6k → 9%BRIGADOON SERVICE DOGS: $35k → 12%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%BRIGADOON SERVICE DOGS: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$221k · 3 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2026, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
2

Total granted

$221k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+473%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25’26
HealthAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BRIGADOON SERVICE DOGS
    4× · 2023–2026 · $148k · revenue +49%
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALASKA & WASHINGTON
    2× · 2023–2025 · $61k · revenue +11%
  • FH
    FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $12k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +16%
  • ES
    EASTERN STAR CHARITIES FOUNDATION OF WA CO DIANA BRATTAINgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +473% · 54% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/6
Grantees still filing
6/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BRIGADOON SERVICE DOGS — $148,103 · AnimalsBRIGADOON SERVICE DOGSMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALASKA & WASHINGTON — $60,702 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALASKA & WASHING…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $23,892 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENAmerican Heart Association Inc — $7,415 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncEASTERN STAR CHARITIES FOUNDATION OF WA CO DIANA BRATTAIN — $5,020 · HealthFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER — $12,466 · Other
Animals$148,103Health$97,029Other$12,466

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBRIGADOON SERVICE DOGS — $148,103 over 4y, 9.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALASKA & WASHINGTON — $60,702 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $7,415 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTERN STAR CHARITIES FOUNDATION OF WA CO DIANA BRATTAIN — $5,020 over 1y, 54% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Order of the Eastern Star of Washington Grand Chapter funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph