Skip to content

· Public charity

Operating Engineers National Charity Fund

To provide charitable assistance to members of the international union of operating engineers and their families who suffer property damage or death in times of national or local disaster.

$129k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0167% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Health$250kEmployment$10kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $10,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $129,350 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $119,350 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARCH OF DIMES GREATER NYNJ MARKET$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ROCKLAND COUNTY BOCES: $25k → 14%MARCH OF DIMES GREATER NYNJ MARKET: $10k → 17%INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS: $250k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 88% of Operating Engineers National Charity Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in DC; by stated purpose, 0%.

Operating Engineers National Charity Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Union of Operating Enginee Lcl Un 1515A15B15C15D15G15H Afl-Ci

The objectives of the union as the representative of its members, are to improve working conditions and living standards of members through collective bargaining, education, training and employee benefits and to establish necessary…

—
2
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 571 Training Fund

Training and education of operating engineers.

Education
3
United Association of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plmbng & Pipe 353 Ppf

Operation of steamfitters' local union for the benefit of its members

—
4
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 957

Labor union

—
5
Internat'l Union of Operating Engineers Local 295-295C Joint Educational Fund

Education and training to improve the skills of member engineers in the international union of operating engineers, local 295-295b, c, d.

Employment
6
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No 153

Labor union

—
7
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 77 & Subs

To provide the membership quality labor conditions.

—
8
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 72

Local Labor Union Representing Members of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

—
9
Laborers International Union of 341 Hcl

Union hall devoted to the betterment of members compensation and working conditions, to secure recognition of workers rights to engage in collective bargaining, and to promote the development and maintenance of on-the-job safety practices…

—
10
Laborers International Union of North America Local #165

Operation of local union.

—
11
Local Union #601 of Ua of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pf Ind

A union to organize employees, service and maintain wages, hours, working conditions and other economic advantages.

—
12
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No 110

Labor union

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Union of Operating Engineers' Local 324; the most unlike its peers is Operating Engineers Local 953 Journeyman & Apprentice Training Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
65/65
Grantees still filing
63/65
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS: $250,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERSIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMARCH OF DIMES GREATER NYNJ MARKET: $10,000 · Other
Other$285,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS: $250,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Operating Engineers National Charity Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Operating Engineers National Charity Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Operating Engineers National Charity Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Operating Engineers National Charity Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $61k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph