Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Onondaga Civic Development Corporation

The ONONDAGA CIVIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION supports the county of onondaga government, businesses, and not for profit corporations.

$307k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Arts & Culture$313kCommunity Improvement$175kEducation$74kFood & Nutrition$60kAnimals$53kHealth$50kEnvironment$46kHousing & Shelter$25kOther$0
02FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $46k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$46,354
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACADEMY AT SYRACUSE STUDIOS INC$250,000
RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY SUNY ESF$46,354
SYRACUSE-ONONDAGA PLANNING AGENCY (COUNTY OF ONONDAGA NY)$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE RESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE OF SYRACUSE NEW YORK: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 27% of Onondaga Civic Development Corporation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 54% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Onondaga Civic Development Corporationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 33% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your field
05the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE ACADEMY AT AMERICAN HIGH INC — $250,000 · EducationTHE ACADEMY AT AMERICAN HIGH INCThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $53,645 · EducationThe Research Foundation for The State Univers…Le Moyne College — $20,000 · EducationLe Moyne CollegeSMG — $60,000 · OtherSMGPRISCILLA MAHAR ANIMAL WELFARE FOUNDATION — $52,500 · OtherPRISCILLA MAHAR ANIMAL WELFARE FOUNDATIONCROUSE HEALTH INC — $50,000 · OtherCROUSE HEALTH INCRESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY SUNY ESF — $46,354 · OtherRESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE STATE UNIVERSITY…SYRACUSE STUDIOS LLC — $33,000 · OtherSYRACUSE STUDIOS LLCAD FILMS LLC — $20,000 · OtherAD FILMS LLCHACK UPSTATE LLC — $15,000 · OtherROBERTS OFFICE FURNITURE CONCEPTS INC — $12,500 · Other+3 more — $25,500 · Other+3 moreCENTERSTATE CORPORATION FOR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY — $125,000 · Community ImprovementCENTERSTATE CORPORAT…FOCUS GREATER SYRACUSE INC — $19,300 · Community ImprovementFOCUS GREATER SYRACU…THE RESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE OF SYRACUSE — $25,000 · Human Services
Education$323,645Other$314,854Community Improvement$144,300Human Services$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTERSTATE CORPORATION FOR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY — $125,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $53,645 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE OF SYRACUSE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLe Moyne College — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOCUS GREATER SYRACUSE INC — $19,300 over 1y, 14% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ACADEMY AT AMERICAN HIGH INC
  • Who funds CENTERSTATE CORPORATION FOR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY
  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York
  • Who funds THE RESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE OF SYRACUSE
  • Who funds Le Moyne College
  • Who funds FOCUS GREATER SYRACUSE INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Onondaga Civic Development Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph