How much did ONE WORLD FUND grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 51% of ONE WORLD FUND’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

socialshakespeare

2021

accesslandheart

2022

rights

2023

scientific literaryliterary educationalchipsfsisidissenttheaterartsworks

2024

san franciscofrancisco operaprospectprofessor josephjoseph buffingtonbuffington robertsroberts scholarship

2025

performanceoculusfellowshiptheaterartsjudsoneducation

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k8 grants · $44k
$10k–50k20 grants · $456k
$50k–250k4 grants · $351k

$19,902

Median grant

States reached

$25M

Total assets

Largest grants

THE PUBLIC THEATER$129,422
FSISIDISSENT$90,559
NATIONAL ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RIGHTS INITIATIVE$80,000
DORRANCE DANCE$51,055
VIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC$40,000
GREAT GLOBE FOUNDATION INC$40,000
SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC$39,650
CELEBRATE THE BEAT$35,310
JOBS WITH JUSTICE$34,939
V-DAY$30,468
FRIENDS OF JUDSON INC$30,000
JACOBIN FOUNDATION LTD$29,592
ENTERTAINMENT COMMUNITY FUND$20,328
DAVIS-PUTTER SCHOLARSHIP FUND$20,063
DSA FUND$20,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 9%. 83% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.3M · 41 repeat orgs$920k to everyone else

41 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.3M

$756k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%

+28%

Still filing today

56%

61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $163k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureEducationInternationalPhilanthropyPublic BenefitEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC
6× · 2020–2025 · $240k · revenue +388%
CF
COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION INC
4× · 2022–2025 · $160k · revenue +57%
FO
FRIENDS OF JUDSON INC
2× · 2022–2025 · $55k · revenue +65%

Funded once

TA
THE AMERICAN PROSPECT INC
one grant, 2024 · $71k · revenue -37%
GP
GRASSROOTS POWER PROJECTgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $70k · revenue +455%
PF
PARTNERS FOR DIGNITY AND RIGHTS
one grant, 2023 · $65k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Ballet Theatre Foundation Inc

The foundation's ballet company, american ballet theatre, designated by congressional resolution in 2006 as america's national ballet company, presents the great repertoire of full-length ballets, one-act classics and pioneering new works…

Arts & Culture

New York Foundation for the Arts Inc

To empower artists at critical stages in their creative lives

Arts & Culture

Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture

Opera Philadelphia

Opera philadelphia is committed to embracing innovation and developing opera for the 21st century.

Arts & Culture

Apollo Theater Foundation Inc

The apollo theater is a commissioner and presenter; catalyst for new artists, audiences, and creative workforce; and partner in the projection of the african american narrative and its role in the development of american and global culture.

Arts & Culture

Opera Parallle

Opera parallle presents compelling performances of contemporary operas with high musical and dramatic standards,embracing modern aesthetics, creative use of technology, and social relevance as essential to the future of the art form.

Arts & Culture

Contra-Tiempo

Contra-tiempo is a bold, multilingual los angeles-based activist dance theater company creating physically intense and politically astute performance work that moves audience to imagine what is possible. We create a new physical, visual…

Arts & Culture

Los Angeles Performance Practice

The organization supports the production and presentation of contemporary theater and dance that use innovative approaches to collaboration, technology, and social engagement. We create opportunities for artists to develop their projects…

Arts & Culture

The Royal National Theatre

At the national, we make world-class theatre that is entertaining, challenging and inspiring. and we make it for everyone.

Arts & Culture

United States Artists Inc

We believe in artists and their essential role in our society. each year, we award up to fifty $50,000 unrestricted fellowships to the most compelling artists working and living in the united states, in all disciplines, at every stage of…

Arts & Culture

The Theatre of the Emerging American

The Theater of the Emerging American Moment, Inc. (The TEAM), is a Brooklyn-based theatre ensemble whose mission is to collaboratively create new works about the experience of living in America today, and to generate dialogue about our…

Arts & Culture

Arts West

ArtsWest produces artistic events that provoke conversation, incite the imagination, and use live theater as a powerful agent of change.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Actors' Fund of America and the most unlike its peers is New Venture Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/52

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,513

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

46 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

44/46

Grantees still filing

24/46

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,254,190Arts & Culture$847,661Education$434,512International$316,507Crime & Legal$180,382Philanthropy$95,000Environment$55,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ford FoundationNY26.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ford Foundation · Tides Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Mertz Gilmore Foundation · New Venture Fund · The San Francisco Foundation · Proteus Fund Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · The Scherman Foundation Inc · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ONE WORLD FUND funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FRIENDS OF JUDSON INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +65% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 844212300 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on FRIENDS OF JUDSON INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 18% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to One World Fund?

Find your warmest path to One World Fund through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ONE WORLD FUND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

46 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to One World Fund?

More from the funding graph

ONE WORLD FUND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

46 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to One World Fund?

More from the funding graph