Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

One Ohio United Inc

To support public policies which foster an environment conducive to retaining and creating jobs in ohio, educate ohio's workforce for a 21st century economy, help state and local government function more efficiently and effectively.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$900k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Environment$8.2MPublic Benefit$1.4MPhilanthropy$1.3MCommunity Improvement$538kEducation$25k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$900,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE INC$900,000
PROSPERITY ALLIANCE INC$437,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 94% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CITIZENS FOR A WORKING AMERICA: $575k → 14%SCHOOL CHOICE OHIO ALLIANCE: $25k → 15%PROSPERITY ALLIANCE INC: $438k → 6%GINGRICH 360: $125k → 7%AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT INC: $605k → 11%THE EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE INC: $2.8M → 15%STATE SOLUTIONS: $25k → 14%OHIOANS FOR A HEALTHY ECONOMY: $50k → 15%THE REVITALIZATION PROJECT: $100k → 6%THE EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE INC: $1.5M → 15%AEF LLC: $1.3M → 15%THE EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE INC: $1.3M → 15%THE EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE INC: $1.1M → 15%THE EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE INC: $900k → 15%THE EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE INC: $527k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Policy Coalition

With a commitment to free market principles, APC focuses on educating the public about conservative fiscal policies that foster job growth, a stronger economy, and increased opportunity for all Americans.

Public Benefit
2
American Jobs and Growth Fund

American Jobs and Growth Fund aims to advances policies to change the long-term fiscal trajectory of the United States through responsible spending policies.

3
Economic Future Fund

Economic Future Fund aims to build a stronger, more vibrant economy for the American people through innovative public policies and free market solutions.

4
Government Integrity Fund

To Conduct research and educate the public about various policy issues across the United States.

5
American Exceptionalism Institute

The organization engaged in public communications and issue education activities related to national security, the protection of life, and tax and spending issues.

Community Improvement
6
A Public Voice Inc

The organization's mission is to promote the common good and general welfare by supporting direct democracy efforts, which give the public a direct voice in the operation of state and local government through the approval or defeat of…

Public Benefit
7
American Jobs and Security

American Jobs and Security was formed to promote the idea of peace and prosperity through strong security policies.

8
Ohio Works

To engage in any lawful act or activity for which not for profit corporations may be formed under chapter 1702 of the ohio revised code or the corresponding provisions of any future ohio statute.

9
American Prosperity Alliance

American Prosperity Alliances mission is to advocate for legislative and regulatory policies that advance economic prosperity in America.

10
United for Clean Power

United for Clean Power is focused on public policies that build a 21st century energy future.

Environment
11
District Charter Alliance

District Charter Alliance advocates for adequate and equitable funding for all public schools and supports transformative policies enabling partnerships and collaboration between districts charters and nonprofits to provide schools with…

12
Consumer Action for a Strong Economy Inc

Case is committed to serving as the voice of american consumers and wage-earners by advocating strongly for free-markets, fiscal responsibility and reasonable consumer protections. through these time-tested principles, case aims to create…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Advancement and the most unlike its peers is State Solutions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Empowerment Alliance — $8,202,177 · OtherThe Empowerment AllianceAEF LLC — $1,250,000 · OtherAEF LLCAmerican Advancement — $605,000 · OtherAmerican AdvancementCITIZENS FOR A WORKING AMERICA INC — $575,000 · OtherCITIZENS FOR A WORKING AMERICA INC+1 more — $125,000 · OtherProsperity Alliance Inc — $437,500 · Public BenefitOHIOANS FOR A HEALTHY ECONOMY INC — $50,000 · Public BenefitSTATE SOLUTIONS INC — $25,000 · Public BenefitThe Revitalization Project — $100,000 · Community ImprovementSCHOOL CHOICE OHIO INC — $25,000 · Education
Other$10,757,177Public Benefit$512,500Community Improvement$100,000Education$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Empowerment Alliance — $8,202,177 over 6y, 100% of budgetAmerican Advancement — $605,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCITIZENS FOR A WORKING AMERICA INC — $575,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetProsperity Alliance Inc — $437,500 over 1y, 24% of budgetThe Revitalization Project — $100,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetOHIOANS FOR A HEALTHY ECONOMY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSTATE SOLUTIONS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSCHOOL CHOICE OHIO INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

A Public Voice IncVA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: A Public Voice Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization One Ohio United Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to One Ohio United Inc?

    Find your warmest path to One Ohio United Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph