Skip to content
One Nation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

One Nation

ONE NATION is a non-profit public policy advocacy organization that is dedicated to educating, equipping, and engaging american citizens to take action on important economic and legislative issues that will shape our nation's future.

$5.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$4.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Public Benefit$12MCommunity Improvement$6.0MCivil Rights$100k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE USA$4,000,000
COALITION FOR PROSPEROUS COMMUNITIES$1,000,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COALITION FOR PROSPEROUS COMMUNITIES: $1.0M → 14%CLT HOST 2020 INC: $1.0M → 10%UNITE FOR COLORADO: $6.9M → 12%GOVERNMENT INTEGRITY FUND: $1.5M → 15%CROSSROADS GRASSROOTS POLICY STRATEGIES: $590k → 7%SUSAN B ANTHONY LIST: $100k → 14%CROSSROADS GRASSROOTS POLICY STRATEGIES: $400k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Policy Coalition

With a commitment to free market principles, APC focuses on educating the public about conservative fiscal policies that foster job growth, a stronger economy, and increased opportunity for all Americans.

Public Benefit
2
United for Clean Power

United for Clean Power is focused on public policies that build a 21st century energy future.

Environment
3
21st Century Policy Institute

21st Century Policy Institute engages in public policy advocacy including advocacy to sustain a dialog around the critical importance of Americas economic and military strength and the related implications both domestically and abroad.

—
4
Coalition for American Excellence
—
5
Defend Us Inc

The organization works to defend, protect, and advance bedrock American values.

—
6
American Jobs and Growth Fund

American Jobs and Growth Fund aims to advances policies to change the long-term fiscal trajectory of the United States through responsible spending policies.

—
7
Prosperity Alliance Inc

Prosperity Alliance is committed to building a stronger economy for all Americans through enacting pro-growth economic policies.

Public Benefit
8
American Common Ground Council Inc

ConservAmerica is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to the development and advancement of market based energy, environmental, and conservation policy.

Environment
9
United States Public Policy Council

To engage in research, education and public awareness campaigns relating to the national security, intelligence and foreign and national policy of the United States of America, and freedom in America and the World. Also to engage in those…

—
10
American Prosperity Alliance

American Prosperity Alliances mission is to advocate for legislative and regulatory policies that advance economic prosperity in America.

—
11
American Jobs and Security

American Jobs and Security was formed to promote the idea of peace and prosperity through strong security policies.

—
12
Conservative Policy Council Fund

To advance policies that promote limited government, support economic growth and business, and seek strong international relationships that enhance American national security and trade objectives.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Coalition for Prosperous Communities Inc; the most unlike its peers is Clt Host 2020 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
1/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITE FOR COLORADO: $6,900,000 · OtherUNITE FOR COLORADOChamber of Commerce of the USA: $4,000,000 · OtherChamber of Commerce of the USAGovernment Integrity Fund: $1,500,000 · OtherGovernment Integrity FundCoalition for Prosperous Communities Inc: $1,000,000 · OtherCoalition for Prosperous Communities IncAmerican Exceptionalism Institute: $2,500,000 · Community ImprovementAmerican Except…CLT HOST 2020 INC: $1,000,000 · Public BenefitCLT HOST 202…CROSSROADS GRASSROOTS POLICY STRATEGIES: $990,000 · Public BenefitCROSSROADS G…Susan B Anthony List Inc: $100,000 · Education
Other$13,400,000Community Improvement$2,500,000Public Benefit$1,990,000Education$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITE FOR COLORADO: $6,900,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetChamber of Commerce of the USA: $4,000,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAmerican Exceptionalism Institute: $2,500,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetGovernment Integrity Fund: $1,500,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetCLT HOST 2020 INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetCoalition for Prosperous Communities Inc: $1,000,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCROSSROADS GRASSROOTS POLICY STRATEGIES: $990,000 over 2y, 69% of budgetSusan B Anthony List Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization One Nation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from One Nation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on One Nation’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home